Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House considers tapping oil reserves

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 11:34 AM
Original message
White House considers tapping oil reserves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Here's how you do it to maximize the effect of depressing oil prices, while minimizing depletion:
Edited on Sun Mar-06-11 12:15 PM by sharesunited
Sell 1000 contracts of West Texas Intermediate crude every three minutes if the bid price is at least a penny higher than the bid price three minutes ago.

Buy back each of those contracts whenever the current price is a nickel cheaper than the price paid for it.

This should be an automated trading program run out of the DOE continuously during WTI domestic trading hours.

The Strategic Oil Reserve would only need to be used to make delivery when net outstanding sell contracts expire.

The federal government can make a profit doing this while crushing rallies.

We actually have the oil. Why not use it punish bull side speculation in the commodity?

(BTW: Does this White House really want cheaper oil prices? Or is expensive oil viewed as promoting green energy alternatives?)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. I think it's reasonable to assume they want cheaper oil prices.
While high energy cost does encourage use of other energy sources, I'm fairly certain that that doesn't outweigh the drag it creates on the economy. If the price of everything increases, and the economy decreases, it means that there's less economic reinvestment, and that's bad for clean energy. It takes money to shift away from oil and coal, and so long as they don't know if they're going to have a job in three months, people aren't going to buy a new electric car.

I also feel I should note that oil is, in reality, only one part of the problem of dirty energy. Coal remains cheap, emits as much CO2 as our oil usage does, and has even more contaminant byproducts creating smog and air pollution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm all for it if it stops those Wall Street oil speculating pricks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. Better that than our phones. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 12th 2024, 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC