Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cop told to stop renting rooms to the homeless

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 06:50 PM
Original message
Cop told to stop renting rooms to the homeless
ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. -- For five years, St. Petersburg police officer Richard Linkiewicz has embodied the city's efforts to help the homeless.

---------------

Linkiewicz began renting bedrooms to people wanting to move from Pinellas Hope into more permanent, enclosed housing with heat and air conditioning.

Many were disabled people or veterans with small monthly checks, or people who could qualify for $450 monthly housing vouchers from the county or city, so $450 became the rent.

At that price, options are limited, said Sheila Lopez, chief executive of Catholic Charities and founding director of Pinellas Hope.

Unlike Linkiewicz, most landlords require first and last month's rent in advance. Renters also usually pay utilities.

-----------------

When the St. Petersburg Times asked to review Linkiewicz's personnel file for this story, the police chief learned about Linkiewicz's renters and gave him a choice: Take a different job within the department or stop renting rooms to people from Pinellas Hope.

http://www.standard.net/topics/features/2011/03/06/helping-homeless-becomes-costly-cop
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. No good deed goes unpunished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's bizarre; why would they care?
He sounds like a cop with a heart.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. conflict of interest. He's renting to the group he's assigned to assist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oh, of course...
That thought did cross my mind.

Thanks!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. So he can't assist the group he is assigned to assist?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Appearance of improriety..it is a big thing if you beleive in ethics in government
I have a hard time anything improper would be happening, but that is how the rules are supposed to work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. So this 'rule' also applies to the SCOTUS? How about Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressiveProfessor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Similar intent is in the ethics rules for the Executive Branch
I do not know about Judicial and Legislative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I guess from their perspective, he's profiting off of them.
I suppose I can see the point, but it's not like he's forcing them into it, or charging unreasonably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. making money for doing it is another thing.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. Not without permission.
Ouch, my head hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. I can see why the PD would want to take a look, but after that look I don't really see that
there's a conflict - he's not preferentially providing a police-related service, or treating people differently on the job, and he can't force them to take the rooms. In a general sense I don't think there's any problem with officers entering private (unrelated) business arrangements with people they met through work; it just seems like it's different this time because the non-cops in question were homeless. If other cops are allowed to have roommates (I presume they are), this should be no different.

I wonder if there's some sort of workaround - perhaps having one of the agency people mentioned in the article select the tenants and collect the money - that would provide enough distance and keep the rooms from going to waste...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hugabear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
18. Kinda hard to beat the shit out of someone when you're treating them like humans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Police chief needs to be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
givemebackmycountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not too long ago I read that St. Petersburg was one of the worst cities to be homeless ...
Not exactly the most friendly place if you are down on your luck.
But then again, it's Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. That police chief shows us a good example why that's so.
Here's a police officer doing what he can to make a difference, and the police chief is telling him to stop. :wtf:

Who this officer has as a tenant should be none of that chief's business. That is an off-duty issue, and as long as there is no evidence that it influence his work negatively, it stays an off-duty issue.

As soon as one of these people starts renting, he's not homeless anymore, so it can't be a conflict of interest if this officer only deals with people who are still homeless in his official capacity. His tenant(s) aren't any of those homeless people. They have a home.

This chief is butting in and throwing his weight around just to show that he can, and no good can come of it. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hateful why..
do they care. Doesn't make any sense at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Many people rent bedrooms out, BUT if they are smart, they do it on the sly
Many communities have zoning issues with this because if you are in a SINGLE-family community, you legally cannot rent rooms out.

Some communities even have a maximum-occupancy rule, to avoid aunts, cousins, parents from moving in with people. It may seem "mean", but communities do have some authority to set rules.

People spend a lot of extra money to move to areas that do not include multi-family dwellings, and their tax rates reflect it.

The fact that he was collecting their assistance money, in exchange for a place to stay, made him their landlord, and their assistance money was effectively being funneled to him..not them..

The fact that the newspaper knew about it, is what messed up his deal..

He can find renters for the empty house, but if he had 5 renters @450 each, that's $2250.00 a month.. he may have to rent to a single family for less than that,..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
14. There are so many things that make getting a home next to impossible.
It is time for people to start understanding this.

Thank you for posting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC