Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Her baby wasn't expected to live, but Nebraska law banned abortion

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:06 PM
Original message
Her baby wasn't expected to live, but Nebraska law banned abortion
Edited on Sun Mar-06-11 07:07 PM by usregimechange
Danielle Deaver cradled her daughter, knowing the newborn's gasps would slowly subside, and the baby would die...

Her life struggle, 15 minutes outside the womb after 23 weeks and five days of gestation, was over.

"Our hands were tied," Danielle Deaver said. "The outcome of my pregnancy, that choice was made by God. I feel like how to handle the end of my pregnancy, that choice should have been mine, and it wasn't because of a law."

http://www.desmoinesregister.com/article/20110306/NEWS10/103060331


A baby suffocating, now that is moral. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm just going to say it -
I hate Crazy Christians.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Oh Yes.
:(

The pain and harm they do to our entire society can't be measured.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
17. I'm just going to say it -
Incorrect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
33. I'm just going to say it -
..you are correct..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmeow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. The mother's comment
"I get so frustrated. I just think if they (lawmakers) thought about their daughter, their sister, their mother, their wife being in this situation, they would never want them to go through that," Danielle Deaver said.

Unfortunately she is wrong - they WOULD want them to go through that ... because that is the "lot of women." Women are supposed to suffer and pregnancy is supposed to be a risk. The religious reich in this country believe that all women need to suffer from Eve's sin. That the father is also suffering doesn't matter to them as long as the mother suffers (preferably more). They would also say that she's being punished for not getting married and starting to get pregnant earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. If the lawmakers families were in this situation
It would be hushed, but they'd get their abortions to spare them this pain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmeow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. It depends
Santorum didn't ... one of his sons was born prematurely and lived only 2 hours, a sonogram showed the birth defect and suggested a very poor prognosis.

There are Mormon elected representatives who also would not get the abortions.

If they want to be that stupid they are welcome to do so. It is the imposition of their extreme religious position on others which is such a huge problem. In Santorum's case it was a choice - he has turned around and tried to force everyone else to live by his twisted morals. That is what makes him a festering wound on the American political body.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. True, true
But any of those extra special privileged types that would and have access to an 'illegal' abortion would have it done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmeow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. And it is true that few
of the Rethug lawmakers who pass these laws have the courage of their convictions - or even that they have the convictions. Even if the procedure was illegal in their state, they would have the money to fly to another state (or another country) to get it done. That is one reason why I think a law making it illegal for an adult (or a parent with their own teenager) to cross state lines to get an abortion would never pass. Right now I think there laws making it illegal for a non-parent/guardian to take a teenager across state lines to get an abortion but I don't think a parent/guardian is restricted from doing so nor an adult from doing it for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapislzi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
36. The only just abortion is *my* abortion. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. There were no winners here.



I hope the RWingnuts and the fundies are proud of themselves.

Assholes.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. These people also encourage mothers to bond with the still born babies...
Seems like that would just be worse. Bonding with a dead body just seems morbid to me. If I never had to look at the body, it could be like I had a miscarriage and there was no baby. What are people thinking? It sounds like torture.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drmeow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
35. I thought what Santorum and his wife
did with their baby (who died 2 hours after birth ... they chose not to abort even though they new) was CREEPY - took the body home with them, introduced "him" to their other children, and slept with it in their bed before taking it back to the hospital the next day. The creepiest part was introducing a dead body to your other kids!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Yes. That is sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalAndProud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. The state needs to butt out. Now.
These decisions should be made by the woman, with consultation and support from her doctor. Period.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder what the *good* folks at Crisis Pregnancy Center (or Live Action)
might have to say about the kind of trauma they helped force on this couple? :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. There was once a website called Misscarriages of Love, Something Awful made fun of it:
http://www.somethingawful.com/d/news/were-all-gonna.php

The website was truly atrocious, with clearly PTSD mothers taking pictures of their miscarried fetuses and putting them in clothes and shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I'm not going to click the link
but I will say that's just gross.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:08 AM
Response to Reply #10
23. Sounds like a site
Rick Santorum would frequent. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
5. Heartbreaking.
My heart breaks for those good people...

:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ohio Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
6. ugh....
It is just shameful the way these fundy nut-cases feel the need to insert themselves between a woman and her doctor. They just have to have control over women. Douchebags.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Republican small government....oh except for a womans womb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angstlessk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. that's the 'shrink government till it is small enough to fit into a woman's womb'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starry Messenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. They think watching our children die or die ourselves is part of a woman's lot in life.
It's time to start calling the so-called pro-lifers by their real name: anti-woman bigots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:46 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. I think they're
sadistic satan lovers. No one could wish such misery on woman and not be some kind of demon.

I'll never step foot in Nebraska. Goddess....WTF is wrong w/ 'people?'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. True.
If they were really pro life, they'd also anti-abortion doctor murder, and God knows they want to fry everyone convicted of a crime.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. So sad for them.
The moment that child was born the law, the state, and the anti-choicers didn't care anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chorophyll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 01:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
22. And from a healthcare/insurance perspective:
It must have cost a lot more for this woman to carry for 23 weeks and give birth to a baby who only lived a few minutes than it would have to terminate the pregnancy. So in addition to the horrible emotional cost, this law enforces an extra financial burden.

Despicable all around, and terribly sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:40 AM
Response to Reply #22
25. and don't forget about burying fees
do sad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pitohui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. yes there is great profit in cruelty and the destruction of women
there is huge, huge, huge profit in suffering in this country, while the ugly face of religious bigots who hate women are on the front lines pushing this cruelty...it would not be the law of our land if a rich corporation did not profit

the rich profit from having a woman undergo longer and more agonizing medical procedures, they do not profit from a woman saving herself w. an inexpensive termination before her body and her mind is altered forever

they profit too from keeping vegetables alive on machines, with false promises that one in a thousand or one in a million might somehow wake up...they know these corpses are the living dead, they know the cost to the families, and there is just too much profit for the doctors, hospitals, nursing homes in keeping vegetables alive

i see so much cruelty in our society, so much of medicine being used to multiple suffering a thousand times what would be possible without technology...and the reason seems very clear to me, the sellers of this technology are getting rich from our suffering

the law does not enforce an extra financial burden by mistake, it does not drain everything a family owns by chance

this is the intention behind the law

the god stuff is a distraction for the stupid people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chorophyll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. What you said. Precisely.
Yet another case of the religious right being the useful idiots of their corporate overlords.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 07:38 PM
Response to Original message
12. The Republicans that voted this sick law in
not once said anything about the baby's suffering. The only thing they said was the baby was born alive. The child suffocated to death....sick bastards they are enjoying this. Yes, I said it because it's about power over someone else's life....bastards..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-06-11 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. When I was about 8, my mother's friend came to our house, weeping
Edited on Sun Mar-06-11 08:50 PM by SoCalDem
Her doctor could not find the heartbeat of her unborn baby. After another visit and no heartbeat, they sent her home to wait until she went into labor..

She went around with a dead baby inside her, for at least 3 weeks until she went into labor & delivered a stillborn baby:(

This was back in 1958, so maybe they did not induce labor back then, but I always though how cruel that was..and potentially dangerous to her own health.

Her doctor apparently told her there was nothing he could do for her..that she would just have to wait.. he also said that there might be a heartbeat but it was too weak to detect..

I think she was about 6 1/2 or 7 months pregnant..

This was at Gorgas Hospital in the Canal Zone..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
24. I posted the Omaha World Herald story 1/2 an hour ago

K&R!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. Their stupid logic is that the possibility of a miracle...
...is more important than the suffering. They are sadistic morons. If I found out that I was having a child who would die a horrible death once outside of my body, I'd have flown to a place where it were legal and gotten the abortion. I can't handle the thought of something suffering because of me or anyone else, and being forced into that situation is immoral and extremely evil.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #27
39. Sure. Miracles happen quite often in their sick made-up world of christian fairy tales. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
29. A good friend experienced something similar
Except she was much farther along when the problem was discovered (thanks to lack of health insurance). Because the public hospital wouldn't deal with such a high-risk case, she was referred to a local children's hospital where the specialist treated her like trash and saw her maybe twice in the 2 days she labored to birth a fetus that died immediately after birth. Laws like this make me want to just scream at the top of my lungs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Will this law be struck down any time soon? Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
37. K&R.
This is just sickening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
38. What a tragic story. That fetus was forced
to develop until the pain of dying became more real, more excruciating for the baby, the medical staff, and the parents and relatives. And the anti-choice extremists seem to think this horrible situation, with two parents watching their baby die, is okay. They don't realize the trauma that something like this creates. Or that the mother has been delayed in her healing from this pregnancy before she can try again, if she would ever want to try again.

I wish the parents had been able to go to a state with a more compassionate termination law. I'm not sure why they didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC