Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ken Feinberg tells foreign journalists he can't pay 80% of the remaining Gulf claims..100,000 claims

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 02:55 PM
Original message
Ken Feinberg tells foreign journalists he can't pay 80% of the remaining Gulf claims..100,000 claims
To which I say BS. 100,000 out of 130,000 claims can not possibly lack credibility. He told this to a group of foreign journalists.

From The Louisiana Record:

Feinberg says 100,000 claims lack proof


Ken Feinberg. Pic courtesy of the Louisiana Record

Gulf Coast Claims Administrator Kenneth Feinberg told a group of foreign journalists yesterday that close to 100,000 claims submitted as a result of the BP oil spill "lack proof."United Press International reported today Feinberg's statement that he cannot pay "80 percent of the remaining 130,000 claims because they lack adequate documentation."

"The claims that were denied had woeful, inadequate or no documentation to speak of," Feinberg is quoted as saying.


The GCCF has come under heavy scrutiny from all parties. Currently state attorneys general and plaintiffs attorneys are arguing that the GCCF is in violation of the Oil Pollution Act of 1990. Recently, Alabama, Mississippi Florida and Louisiana all filed memos criticizing Feinberg and the GCCF.


Feinberg is now being sued. It is "a first-of-its-kind lawsuit alleging gross negligence and fraud" and it has been filed in a Florida state court against Kenneth Feinberg, the administrator of the 20-billion-dollar compensation fund for victims of BP's Gulf oil spill, and the Gulf Coast Claims Facility (GCCF).

From Dahr Jamail at Truth Out:

Lawsuit Filed Against BP Compensation Czar

Attorney Brian Donovan of the Donovan Law Group from Tampa filed the complaint against Feinberg, his firm Feinberg Rozen, LLP and the GCCF on behalf of Pinellas Marine Salvage, Inc. and John Mavrogiannis.

The complaint alleges, in part, gross negligence, fraud, fraudulent inducement and unjust enrichment on the part of the defendants.

"Feinberg and the GCCF have done more damage than the oil spill," Donovan told IPS. "My client has relied on what Feinberg said he would do. They've made promises they didn't keep. John's company was promised money they have not received."


Mavrogiannis told IPS, "We're sick and tired of this runaround. I'm tired of Feinberg's lies. He's made promises he hasn't kept. He's manipulating the system and that's not right."


In fact a judge ruled that Kenneth Feinberg could not go around pretending he is independent of BP. His firm actually gets paid hundreds of thousands from BP monthly.

BP payment Tsar 'not independent'

US District Judge Carl Barbier said he was ordering BP, Mr Feinberg and any of their agents to change the way they communicated with people seeking money from the fund.
Judge Barbier said Mr Feinberg must clearly disclose in all communications that he was acting for and on behalf of BP in fulfilling its obligations as the responsible party under the Oil Pollution Act.


The judge stopped short of ordering changes to a release form that people who accept final payments from the fund must sign. He asked lawyers to submit additional briefs to the court on that, as well as address the question of whether BP was complying fully with the law in the processing of claims.

..."Lead lawyers in hundreds of claims filed over last year's Gulf Of Mexico rig explosion and massive oil spill had asked Judge Barbier to intervene in the communications between Mr Feinberg and fund claimants. The attorney generals in Mississippi and Louisiana have backed the motion and Florida joined in on Wednesday.

Judge rules Ken Feinberg is not independent of BP. He must stop saying that he is.


Feinberg was appointed by the president. I keep waiting to hear some outrage over how this has been handled. This is one of the worst disasters our country has seen, and to send someone whose firm works for BP is wrong.

I notice that the Center for American Progress is covering it now.

BP Backs Away From Its Commitments to Restore the Gulf Coast While Collecting Windfall Profits


SOURCE: AP/Patrick Semansky
Institute for Marine Mammal Studies veterinary technician Wendy Hatchett holds up a jar containing organ samples from dead dolphins found along the Gulf Coast in Gulfport, Mississippi.


Nine months ago, in the aftermath of the explosion and collapse of the Deepwater Horizon offshore oil rig, the 24-hour news networks doubled as 24-hour oil spill cams, with a picture-in-picture window of the out-of-control undersea gusher serving as a constant reminder of the ongoing environmental calamity. At the time, promises to clean up the polluted waters and coastlines gushed with equivalent expedience from the mouths of BP executives testifying on Capitol Hill. Yet today, as the world’s attention is focused on political upheaval in the Gulf of Sidra and the Gulf of Aden rather than environmental upheaval in the Gulf of Mexico, BP is quietly retreating from its responsibility to restore the environmental and economic health of the Gulf coast.


Guess who is questioning the Feinberg ties to BP. A Republican from Louisiana, David Vitter.

Last Friday, Sen. David Vitter (R-LA) sent a letter to Ken Feinberg, the oil spill “claims czar,” tasked with overseeing the $20 billion escrow fund established by BP at the behest of President Obama to make payments to Gulf residents affected by the spill. In the letter, Vitter questioned Feinberg’s independence given that his contract for remuneration from BP is structured to be renegotiated with the oil giant every three months. This arrangement flies in the face of BP’s then-CEO Tony Hayward who pledged to the House Energy Committee in June of last year that the claims mediator would be “fully independent of BP.”


And to those who keep saying all the Gulf is fine now, the seafood is fine...read these findings.

* Figures compiled by Louisiana Seafood News show that landings of oysters, shrimp, and crabs from January through October of 2010 were all down more than 50 percent.
* Scores of dead dolphins , many of them newborns or partial term fetuses, have begun washing up on Gulf shores, though the cause of these unusual strandings remains under investigation.
* High levels of toxic chemicals have surfaced in some Gulf residents’ blood.
* The spill caused significant psychological stress and hardship even to communities not directly touched by oil.

...And by the way, the state of Alaska and the U.S. Department of Justice have a pending court claim suggesting Exxon still owes them $92 million. This time around, the American people and the federal government must ensure history does not repeat itself.

As our former president infamously malapropped, “fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice…” It appears we are all, in fact, on the cusp of being fooled again.


It looks like Feinberg promised again to improve the claims process

Ken Feinberg promised top Alabama elected officials on Friday that he would improve oil spill claims operations, and that his Gulf Coast Claims Facility will process at least 25 percent of all pending claims by March 31.

..."Some government leaders along the coast expressed doubt about Feinberg’s Friday pledges.

“He’s been saying that for six months,” said Gulf Shores Councilman Jason Dyken.


It seems that Feinberg is not being held accountable by any higher authorities. I can't blame those leaders for expressing doubt.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. "under no formal and direct government oversight"
I did not realize that there really was no direct government oversight. An article from today:

http://www.nola.com/opinions/index.ssf/2011/03/louisiana_legislature_is_right.html

"Kenneth Feinberg, who administers BP's $20 billion compensation fund, has come under criticism for his decisions on some claims and for his lack of transparency about some aspects of his claims process.

So it's not surprising that Louisiana legislative leaders feel they need to take a more active role in overseeing Mr. Feinberg's Gulf Coast Claims Facility. The move seems warranted, considering that almost 200,000 Louisianians have sought compensation from Mr. Feinberg and that he's currently under no formal and direct government oversight.

House Speaker Jim Tucker, of Algiers, and Senate President Joel Chaisson III, of Destrehan, are setting up a legislative committee to be a watchdog of the GCCF. That's similar to a special committee lawmakers set up to oversee recovery after the 2005 hurricanes."

That committee sounds like a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Gotta do it, otherwise the vultures will pick our bones clean.
Can't trust anyone with a lot of money, should always be oversight imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. And the question remains...
why isn't there oversight? Was that part of the administration's 20 billion dollar deal with BP?

One wonders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. You and I don't wonder, we know.
We see what is happening to public education and know that if Obama will let corporations take over the most important institution in America, what does BP actually mean to him? Nothing imo, he already 'cleared' that event off the books and it is 'over'. Kinda like what he is going to do to education imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackspade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. kind of like torture,
WMD lies, war crimes, Wall Street fraud, 'education reform', etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 02:51 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. The list is getting too long...reform? If burning a tree down, is saving it then yes.
Down is up, black is white. I thought I voted for a progressive and all I got was Ronnie-lite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
5. fraud ........ throw his ass in jail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 05:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. kenny is on the payroll of bp
Ken Feinberg, BP Not Independent According To Judge

NEW ORLEANS — The administrator of the $20 billion compensation fund for Gulf oil spill victims is not independent from BP and must stop telling potential claimants that he is, a federal judge said in a ruling Wednesday that may spur more people to sue rather than settle.

U.S. District Judge Carl Barbier said claims czar Ken Feinberg and any of his agents must change the way they communicate with people seeking money from the fund. The ruling came just hours after Feinberg released details on how final payments would be determined.

The ruling cuts at the heart of one of Feinberg's central arguments that because he's independent, thousands of people who have been denied money or received less than they feel they deserve should trust his decisions. And it could prompt more people to sue rather than accept relatively quick settlements with the fund, raising the potential for further uncertainty and liability for BP.

Barbier said Feinberg must clearly disclose in all communications that he is acting for and on behalf of BP in fulfilling its obligations as the responsible party under the Oil Pollution Act.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/03/ken-feinberg-bp-not-indep_n_817933.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jakes Progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Heckova job Feiny.
I see that coming up in a WH press conference any day now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. How can he have no oversight at all?
And his firm gets $850,000 a month from BP....ridiculous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. That's what I call 'due diligence'.

The investors should be pleased as punch.

That's capitalism for ya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Um, foreign journalists?
Too bad we don't have any journalists here in the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Hey! Charlie Sheen is One Fucking Important Story - and don't you forget it!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Ain't that the truth? Even O'Donnell's show is wearing thin.
Turned it off the other night when he spent so much of the show on Sheen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grahamhgreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
14. What oil man appointed this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC