Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“What prisoner would not avail himself of this additional bite at the apple?” Justice Thomas asked.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:32 PM
Original message
“What prisoner would not avail himself of this additional bite at the apple?” Justice Thomas asked.
Justices Allow Inmates To Sue for DNA Testing
By ADAM LIPTAK
Published: March 7, 2011

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday made it easier for inmates to sue for access to DNA evidence that could prove their innocence.

-----------------------------------

Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Antonin Scalia, Stephen G. Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan joined the majority opinion.

Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justices Anthony M. Kennedy and Samuel A. Alito Jr., dissented. Justice Thomas predicted that Monday’s ruling would flood the courts with civil rights suits. “What prisoner would not avail himself of this additional bite at the apple?” Justice Thomas asked.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kennah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if that will be his statement upon his conviction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rustydog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yo, Oh mighty silent one...How fucking many INNOCENT people
have been exonerated by DNA evidence? Fuck you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Justice Slappy is on record: Guilt or innocence is immaterial
Only whether the forms of criminal procedure were observed (but not necessarily followed). If the police and prosecutor make a show of following procedure, and the accused is convicted, that's good enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. What 'Family Values' RepubliStooge would not avail himself of a Coke can
Edited on Mon Mar-07-11 08:40 PM by SpiralHawk
to make a crude, sexist and stupid remark to one of his female employees?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
markpkessinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I am somewhat shccked to see that Scalia and Roberts were part of this majority! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. me too!!! Scalia and Thomas went their separate ways on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msanthrope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
6. Indeed, Justice Thomas. If we have have pesky things like civil rights, then
people are going to want to use them.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Strictly theater. With all the Thomas headlines recently he is..
attempting to look like his own man. Oddly enough he picked a just ruling to be on the wrong side of. What a moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sal Minella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think he's just attempting to look awake. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 09:28 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, he talks? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Had the same reaction...
the only Justice to go years on end with no comment or questioning during the hearing of cases before the Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-07-11 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
11. He actually fucking spoke? This is huge news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
13. Uncle Thomas is anti-civil rights? Who knew?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC