Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

My Exclusive Interview with WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange --- by Cenk Uygur

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 07:52 PM
Original message
My Exclusive Interview with WikiLeaks Founder Julian Assange --- by Cenk Uygur
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 07:54 PM by kpete
VIDEO:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yL8g3vye4xo

JULIAN ASSANGE, FOUNDER, WIKILEAKS: Good evening, Cenk.

UYGUR: All right, the first question I have for you, Julian, is do you consider yourself a member of the press?

Are you a journalist?

ASSANGE: Well, I have been a member of the Australian press union for many years. I co-authored my first book when I was 25 and have been involved in setting up the -- the very fabric of the Internet in Australia since 1993 as a publisher.

So quite interesting that this is something that is being raised.

It's -- it's actually a quite deliberate attempt to split off our organization from the First Amendment protections that are afforded to all publishers.

You know, as time has gone by and our journalism has increased, I've been pushed up into senior management, into a position where I manage other journalists. I now even am in a -- in a position where I'm managing the interrelations between "The Guardian," "Spiegel," "The New York Times," "Al Jazeera" and so on, which were used in -- in our last production.

So, yes, unfortunately, I don't write that much anymore, because I'm busy being editor-in-chief, coordinating the actions of other journalists. But a quite deliberate attempt to split us off in the mind of the public from those "good" traditions of the United States, protecting the rights of the press to publish, to split us off from the support of the press in the United States, the support of journalists.

Some of those journalists have fallen for that.

And why?

Because they're worried that they're going to be next.
They believe that if they sell us out, if they say, well, he's not really a journalist, they can have the U.S. -- have the Washington authorities target us and destroy us and somehow steer clear of the crossfire, which they worry will -- will scatter out through all journalists.

But I have a message to them. They're going to be next. And we're seeing these statements that "The New York Times" is -- is, you know, is now also being looked at in terms of whether it has engaged in what they call a conspiracy to con -- commit espionage.

So us journalists and publishers and writers, we all have to stick together to resist this sort of reinterpretation of the First Amendment, this attempt to use the 1917 Espionage Act, something that was put in place in the middle of World War -- toward the end of World War II, in the middle of the U.S. involvement in World War I, to stop bona fide espionage in World War I.

Now, we've got this antiquated act that they are trying to apply to publishers, arguably, unconstitutional. But that will take many years to get through the court.

And in the meantime, what happens?

In the meantime, we have our people harassed. We have calls to apply this to -- to other newspapers.

All members of the press and -- and all the American people who believe in freedom and the -- and the good founding principles of revolution -- of the revolutionary fathers have got to pull together and resist this attack on the First Amendment.

..................

.......

WAY MORE (interesting too, kp): http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/12/22/931037/-My-Exclusive-Interview-with-WikiLeaks-Founder-Julian-Assange
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oceansaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. LOL the more I read from this guy
the more of a clown I think he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. No clown
He is busting balls, big time. Good for him and good for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xiamiam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. send in the clowns then..i am very impressed..he's right..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Who, Cenk or Julien?
Though I agree with what Julien does, he's a tool. Cenk is just a tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherylK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. LOL
So obvious with the sour grapes!!!

:dunce: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes, I couldn't possibly actually think someone is tool
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 09:57 PM by HEyHEY
Based on their ego and condescending bullshit. Everything is cause of sour grapes. Maybe if you were an adult, you'd be able to separate what someone does with how they act toward people and instead of kissing their ass you'd see they are what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Assange is a clown? So why isn't the right-wing laughing at him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
25. See: Video of the air attack on citizens and 2 Reuters' journalists?
If there is a "clown" it certainly isn't Assange --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. And the more most other people around the world read about him
the more support he is getting.

Excellent points made by him regarding freedom of the press.

He is an award-winning editor and publisher of an International news org, started by people from various backgrounds and from countries like China (Chinese dissidents were involved in the creation of Wikileaks) where it is dangerous to operate a free press.

Apparently it is dangerous to do so here in the U.S. also, proven by the outrageous assaults on Wikileaks and causing people around the world to understand even more than ever before, the very reason why we need MORE independent news organizations like Wikileaks.

Btw, what do you think of the way this 'clown' got justice for the tortured, murdered and disappeared in Kenya for which he received a 'New Media' award btw? Should he have done what our 'journalists' did in that case, not been a 'clown' about it and minded his own business?

He was a hero to the world of people who condemn human rights abuses everywhere, long before the U.S. Government went after him.

Sorry you view people who risk their very lives for others, as 'clowns'. I view them as heroes and am not at all surprised to see the reaction of the MIC towards someone exposing their lies and crimes.

But I am in awe of someone who knew what the risks were to inform the public and was willing to do so anyhow. The calls for his assassination and for his family's murder from the U.S. have disgraced this country even more than the revelations from the leaks. We have been well and truly propagandized into complete submission along with our press, if we are to believe some of the reactions to truth being told.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. Thank you, kpete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. Internet vs. Traditional news media
"So, yes, unfortunately, I don't write that much anymore, because I'm busy being editor-in-chief, coordinating the actions of other journalists. But a quite deliberate attempt to split us off in the mind of the public from those "good" traditions of the United States, protecting the rights of the press to publish, to split us off from the support of the press in the United States, the support of journalists.

Some of those journalists have fallen for that.

And why?

Because they're worried that they're going to be next. They believe that if they sell us out, if they say, well, he's not really a journalist, they can have the U.S. -- have the Washington authorities target us and destroy us and somehow steer clear of the crossfire, which they worry will -- will scatter out through all journalists."


Newspaper and television reporters like to dismiss bloggers and internet news not because they aren't journalists, but because they are in direct competition. It's just an attempt to invalidate their work. But where would we be without internet news sources or blogs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UpInArms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. being put in the position of having to be the "editor" makes one have to relinquish
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 11:00 PM by UpInArms
the pen ... sadly - because other duties require so much energy ... and writing requires SO MUCH energy ... but the two things - writer and editor ... both are

journalists.

(edited for typo)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow, Cenk just give the guy a microphone and don't bother
With any actual interview.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #7
14. He should have been more like Jim Sciutto, ABC News: TABLOID SCHMUCK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. He is a tabloid schmuck
He should have been more like an interviewer. Though there's hardly any of them left these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #14
24. funny, Assange didn't think he was a tabloid schmuck for any
of the interview up to the point where he was asked a legitimate question concerning the allegations that were heard in court. And he doesn't have any problem spewing his own tabloid schmuckery... you know, like how women just love him and care for him work their fingers to the bone for him, etc. Noooo, no tabloid schmuckery there whatsoever!
:rofl:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. nonsense
Sciutto's question would have had legitimacy only from a prosecutor in court. In the context of a TV interview, it would have been a trap for Assange to give any answer. No answer (including complete denial) would have looked good. Any answer would have been used to hang him with the public -- except for one, which was exactly what he did.

Jim Sciutto, Tabloid Schmuck, Sciutto Jim, ABC News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-22-10 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. Good interview. Glad Cenk gave him time to speak. And Assange is correct, what
Edited on Wed Dec-22-10 11:59 PM by 20score
WikiLeaks does is journalism and it's fantastic that they exist. He's also correct in pointing out that the people calling for his assassination fit the definition of terrorists.

The more the evil forces in the world fight this man, the greater they make him, as they lessen their own status in history.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. It is worth repeating that his whole career in various journalistic projects
has been stripped out by our media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #13
17. It was nice getting to actually hear Assange in his own words
instead of being railroaded by politicians or mainstream media - and yeah good of Cenk to give him time to actually explain where he's coming from and not just limiting it to soundbytes as is so often done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojeoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Agreement! Stay safe Julian.
If you had people in high places calling for your DEATH, you'd be a media hound too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cowpunk Donating Member (572 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. I thought the questions were stupid
Who the hell cares how Julian Assange feels about Sarah Palin?

Cenk should have allowed Assange to address more serious criticisms of Wikileaks. Also, Cenk began the interview by parroting the falsehood that Wikileaks has indisciminately dumped hundreds of thousands of documents onto the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theFrankFactor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
19. And yet some idiots complain about Cenk? Really?
One of the most powerful interviews with Assange and people bitch about the interviewer... Because he "didn't interview"!? Too stupid to laugh at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Le Taz Hot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
20. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
21. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
22. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
23. K&R. The interview was great, Cenk let him speak without
interruption and asked very good questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
26. Thanks ... and all journalists are feeling this FEAR being induced by US government/CIA ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
29. Good interview, kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, kpete.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 06:25 PM
Response to Original message
30. Excellent interview. Highly recommend!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC