Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Associated fruit lays off half it's workers - says without credit extension, it will fold

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 01:06 PM
Original message
Associated fruit lays off half it's workers - says without credit extension, it will fold

The 70-year-old Phoenix-based company says without credit extension, it will fold


"We buy crop insurance every year, but this year it didn't make up for level of loss," said Associated Fruit President David Lowry. "We expected a normal year, and then we had a couple nights where it was extremely cold and the pears froze."

Lowry declined to say how many employees were laid off, but said it was at least a dozen across all parts of the operation.

In another era, the 70-year-old company could have negotiated a disastrous year such as this one, when the crop was less than 50 percent of predicted tonnage, without resorting to layoffs and downsizing. But declining land values have shrunk the amount of dollars lenders are willing to forward growers.

"Basically, we just ran out of land value collateral to satisfy (South Valley Bank & Trust's) requirements," Lowry said. "The irony of the Oregon land-use system designed to protect farming was that in overprotecting land, it becomes so devalued that you can't use it to raise money for collateral.

"An orchard on exclusive-farm-use land doesn't have much value under the Oregon land-use system. An acre of orchard land might be worth $10,000, while that same acre might be worth $100,000 closer to town. You can see the horrific impact it has on a company's financial position."

http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110308/NEWS/103080324
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-08-11 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't understand the Oregon land use
The property is devalued to minimize the taxes paid on it? Correct?
And the land in Arizona has been in a bubble for many years up until last year--so they have not being paying fair taxes on it? Is that correct?
So they have prime real estate that they have not been paying fair taxes on...and now that the land is devalued because of the bubble--they need to lay off people?
Sorry...I know I am not connecting the dots in the right order--I have the flu--head not completely clear--but it seems to me that something stinks here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC