Coup d'etat?

[deminks]

I don't see any other way to describe it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coup_d%27%C3%A9tat



Question - did he do this to exclude the Democratic 14? or did he do this to preempt moderate Republicans?

[Pharaoh]

1. Yes it is!

[derby378]

2. Coup d'etat!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fC50mcqOhc0

[deminks]

3. Naomi Klein calls it a Corporate Coup D'etat

http://www.democracynow.org/2011/3/9/naomi_klein_on_anti_union_bills

Naomi Klein on Anti-Union Bills and Shock Doctrine American-Style: "This is a Frontal Assault on Democracy, It’s a Kind of a Corporate Coup D’Etat"

[NuttyFluffers]

4. obviously so.

anyone else who says otherwise undoubtedly knows nothing of the meaning of the concept.

[deminks]

5. help me keep this kicked as you watch the legislative coverage on Rachel

clearly illegal, clearly a violation of open meetings rule.

Coup d'etat, Coup d'etat, Coup d'etat, Coup d'etat.

[RagAss]

6. Yes...but they don't care.

[Horse with no Name]

7. Think so.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=541862&mesg_id=542013

[Generic Brad]

8. It's a trick to lure the Democratic 14 back to Wisconsin

It's an illegal vote made under illegal pretenses and will not hold up in court. They are just trying to trick the Democratic 14 into returning so they can force a vote on the original bill. They are evil, transparent fucks.