Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here's my understanding of the Wisconsin open meeting law.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Sonicwall Donating Member (191 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 08:33 PM
Original message
Here's my understanding of the Wisconsin open meeting law.
Wisconsin's open meeting law.

http://www.wisfoic.org/an-openmeetingslaw.html

Take a close look at Section 19.83(1)(2) and 19.84 (1-4).

I also read 19.85 (exemptions to the law) and saw that there is no exception to exactly what the Republicans did to break the law.

(1) was violated clearly - it was quickly convened and ended within 5 minutes. There was an ignored objection to the meeting.

Also, please note 19.86:

19.86 Notice of collective bargaining negotiations.

Notwithstanding s. 19.82 (1), where notice has been given by either party to a collective bargaining agreement under subch. I, IV or V of ch. 111 to reopen such agreement at its expiration date, the employer shall give notice of such contract reopening as provided in s. 19.84 (1) (b). If the employer is not a governmental body, notice shall be given by the employer's chief officer or such person's designee. This section does not apply to a nonprofit corporation operating the Olympic ice training center under s. 42.11 (3).

This tells me that the Republicans didn't even give a shit about the open meeting law and did it their own way.

It'll bite back. Karma, that is...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. From your keyboard to Goddess' eyes!
Karma can be a real bitch to those who screw with her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejpoeta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. they didn't give a shit about anything this whole time, why should they let a silly thing
like an open meeting law get in their way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-09-11 08:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. The Dem 14 need to stay in Illinois. Because ....
if the anti-bargaining language is still in the other part of the bill that hasn't been voted on yet with the fiscal elements ... then if the dems come back and go into the Capitol the GOP might run that vote through. And then the 'legal' vote will would hold, even when the 'illegal' one that they did tonight probably won't.

Did ya'll understand that?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC