theophilus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:28 PM
Original message |
Well, we can't push for another party to support so we need to change all |
|
of our elected "democratic" officials for other really democratic representatives. How do we do that?
|
Moondog
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:29 PM
Response to Original message |
TheKentuckian
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. With extreme prejudice and no political calculation on "viability". |
|
Force a real choice of extremes or for the pukes to moderate to appeal to more voters. Either way is a net win for America.
|
SidDithers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:31 PM
Response to Original message |
2. You most certainly can push for another party to support... |
|
you just can't do it here.
But you're free to go elsewhere and push as much as you want for another party.
Sid
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:33 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I think we need a labor party. |
|
The Democrats have strayed off their original focus. Time to bring it back. Let's face it the majority of Americans work for a living. I think it might be the way to unite everyone except the filthy rich.
|
libmom74
(577 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
global1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
11. Either A Labor Party Or A Progessive Party..... |
|
we need to take the lead from the Teabaggers. Just like they are pulling the Repugs further right - we need a counterbalance and perhaps a Labor Party or a Progressive Party can pull the Dems back further left or at least get them off dead center.
|
Cleita
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. Something like that within the Democratic Party. |
|
Be prepared to be marginalized though like Howard Dean and Dennis Kucinich. The corporate Blue Dogs don't like that kind of liberalism.
|
global1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Screw The Corporate Blue Dogs...... |
|
Do you think the Teabaggers worried about being marginalized? I think not.
|
theophilus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
14. Good idea! We are many, they are few. n/t |
provis99
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:34 PM
Response to Original message |
5. forget it. the corporate Democrat is the wave of the future. |
|
just get used to them. Maybe they can do some little social policies, like DADT or something. Expecting them to change to become less like Republicans is a pipe dream.
|
SidDithers
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. DADT repeal is just a "little social policy"?...nt |
global1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:40 PM
Response to Original message |
8. When The President Campaigns For 2012 - What Will He Say This Time..... |
|
How will he be believable? Seems to me is that the only thing he has going for himself is to show just how bad the Repugs have been when they had their chance at leading after the 2010 elections. In light of the recent events - he could point out what the Repug Governor's did in the states they lead. He can show what a phoney Boehner and his cronies are? He can point out the wacko Rep King and his Muslim witch hunt - but I don't know if he can make any promises of what he will do. I just don't think he would come off as being believable this time around.
I'm thinking he won't be campaigning to people like me - because despite all his flaws - I would vote for him again - just because I don't want the alternative. So who is he going to direct his efforts too? Independents? Disgruntled Repugs? Disgruntled Teabaggers? Who?
|
Imajika
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:40 PM
Response to Original message |
9. That is precisely what the Tea Party did... |
|
...and many here mocked them.
They drove out their "moderates" and put the fear of God in the rest to make them toe the radical right line.
The truth is, from a strategic standpoint, they succeeded in pushing the GOP about as far right as it's ever been - and they are still pushing. Sure, they blew some races by nominating nutcases so out of the mainstream they had no chance to win or didn't win elections they probably should have (examples: O'Donnell and Angle), but they don't care. To the Tea Party conservative movement, it is worth losing a few races in order to fundamentally create a more unified far right party - a party with elected officials they can count on to vote how they want.
How many times do some conservadems or DINO's give the Republicans cover by breaking with us? How many times could we have won votes if only we'd stick together on important issues and not lose a pile of Blue Dogs who throw their lot in with the GOP? Well, the Tea Party conservatives had that problem on their side of the aisle to, and they've set about weeding their unreliable folks out. We could learn a little from what they are doing. While the Tea Party is loathsome, its strategy of pushing an existing party in the direction they want it has been impressive. The grass roots, the most partisan conservatives are taking over the carcass of the Republican party instead of trying to create a new one.
Even stalwarts like Lugar, Hatch, etc, are not immune. If they don't toe the line, they get primaried, and if the Tea Party lose a few seats in the process then so be it.
I am not saying we should be like them, but even one's enemies sometimes come up with strategies worth emulating.
|
Berserker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-10-11 09:41 PM
Response to Original message |
|
the lobbyists are having to spend millions now getting what they want done with two parties. Another party would cost them too much. Christ think of the money for once will ya.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu May 09th 2024, 03:40 AM
Response to Original message |