Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When RWnutz talk about Social Security

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 08:44 AM
Original message
When RWnutz talk about Social Security
Edited on Fri Mar-11-11 08:45 AM by SHRED
Have you heard them when you challenge them on not receiving it if they hate it so much?
They say, "Fine, I'll give it up when you pay me what is in my account so far...with back interest".

Why aren't they applying this same logic to the public pensions they want to remove from others?
They aren't saying write a check to public employees (with interest) on every dollar negotiated and contributed into a public pension ...are they? Why not?

Why not?
Because they are two-faced hypocrites...that's why.


---

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Indydem Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. That's pretty simple, actually.
They look at their paychecks and see their dollars going into ss.

Pensions are benefits; they never appear on a paycheck as earnings and are contributed on behalf of the employee by their employer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. public pensions


Employees do too contribute.
Where did you get the notion they don't?
And most are not in Social Security.

Just as with SS. The employer contributes and the employee contributes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SHRED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. more:


"The question journalists should be asking is "who contributes" to the state of Wisconsin' s pension and health care plans.

The fact is that all of the money going into these plans belongs to the workers because it is part of the compensation of the state workers. The fact is that the state workers negotiate their total compensation, which they then divvy up between cash wages, paid vacations, health insurance and, yes, pensions. Since the Wisconsin government workers collectively bargained for their compensation, all of the compensation they have bargained for is part of their pay and thus only the workers contribute to the pension plan. This is an indisputable fact. "


http://www.tax.com/taxcom/taxblog.nsf/Permalink/UBEN-8EDJYS?OpenDocument
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indydem Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. You can't have it both ways.
Either the employees in wi are getting paid 104k in pay and benefits as faux news and others claim, or they are receiving off the books benefits, paid by their employer for them.

I guarantee if they actually had the option to take those deferred benefits as pay, many would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sarcasmo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. My wife and father both have pensions and both contributed heavily to said pension.
You need to recheck you're information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indydem Donating Member (866 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Correct.
Yes, many do. That was not my focus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Ask them to tell you exactly what they
put into FICA over the years. When I look at my yearly statements from the Social Security Administration I'm quite shocked at how little I put in, especially compared to what my benefit will be. There is no way that the amount I contributed so far would provide the benefit I'm going to get, unless you assume I was sufficiently prescient to say, invest heavily in Microsoft stock in 1987.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC