Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

China tests missile defense system

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Xicano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 03:25 PM
Original message
China tests missile defense system
Edited on Fri Mar-11-11 03:26 PM by Xicano
China used a top-secret SC-19 anti-satellite (ASAT) missile in a test last year against a target missile as part of a missile-defense system that remains shrouded in secrecy.

The ASAT missile was fired against a new medium-range missile and details were disclosed in a State Department cable made public recently by WikiLeaks that included an outline of a diplomatic protest note to Beijing about both Chinese weapons programs.

The cable provides the first detailed U.S. assessment of what defense officials say is a major strategic advancement in China’s military buildup. It reveals that China’s anti-satellite system was developed for use not only against satellites but is part of a larger strategic missile-defense system.

Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates offered to hold strategic talks with China on missile defenses, as well as space, nuclear and cyberweapons, during a recent visit to Beijing. The offer was rebuffed by China’s defense minister, who said only that it would be studied.

---

Chinese state-run media announced the January 2010 test in a two-sentence statement that made no mention of the use of the SC-19. The SC-19’s first successful test destroyed a Chinese weather satellite in January 2007, resulting in thousands of pieces of debris in orbit that remain a threat to both manned and unmanned space flight.

The current U.S. strategic missile defense has no direct capabilities for shooting down satellites. However, the Navy modified a ship-based SM-3 anti-missile interceptor to shoot down a falling U.S. satellite in 2008.


http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/mar/9/inside-the-ring-846232496/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Let them. The tolerances for missile defense are insanely hard to accomplish.
Intercepting one missile with another is a situation where even the tiniest error results in failure. Given current technology, it's incredibly hard to do, and basically impossible to do RELIABLY without a significant technical advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And the US has a pretty reliable missile defense system
with the PAC-3. Consistent threat interceptor. And pretty interesting technology involved in it...it has to be able to determine the difference between a threat aircraft wing and body or where the exact right point to hit an incoming missile is. And using kinetic energy to do it all. Interesting.

The Chinese are so secretive, I'm interested in hearing/reading more about what they say their system can do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-11-11 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Makes ya wonder how much garbage they produced this time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC