Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember when the right threw a hissy fit when Prop 8 came before a judge who was also gay?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 04:05 PM
Original message
Remember when the right threw a hissy fit when Prop 8 came before a judge who was also gay?
On Tuesday, Gov. Tim Pawlenty appointed Jamie L. Anderson to the 4th Judicial District Court following the retirement of Judges Tanja Manrique. Press reports note that Anderson is the wife of Pawlenty’s deputy chief of staff and that the appointment raised eyebrows because the governor bypassed the standard judicial selection process to tap a friend’s wife who has little major legal experience. But one fact may shed some light on the appointment: Anderson has ample religious right experience.

Pawlenty picked Anderson without going through the Commission on Judicial Selection, which vets applications for judicial positions and makes recommendations to the governor. Pawlenty skipped that process, and while legally he has that right and past governors have also done the same, local media picked up on it because Anderson is a friend of Pawenty’s. As MinnPost notes, she’s married to Paul Anderson, who serves as his deputy chief of staff.

“Anderson was a surprise choice because she works for a small firm, has not been a prominent lawyer and was not screened through the Commission on Judicial Selection,” the Star Tribune wrote on Tuesday.

But she has handled some high-profile cases for the religious right.

Anderson served as counsel for the Minnesota Family Council (MFC) when that group recently petitioned a Hennepin County judge to become defendants in a case seeking to overturn Minnesota’s ban on same-sex marriage. Three couples have filed suit against Hennepin County and the State of Minnesota challenging the state’s Defense of Marriage Act. The case will be heard in the 4th Judicial District Court, the same court where Anderson was appointed.

http://minnesotaindependent.com/75596/pawlentys-bypass-pick-for-judge-was-lawyer-for-minnesota-family-council

How many conflicts of interest can you spot? Pawlenty must be trying to go for a record or something, he is REALLY trying to become the GOP's man in 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. But it's the Republican way to hand out plums to friends and family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. Little timmy has no moral code
the only code he follows is how best to serve himself and to hell with anyone else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
toddwv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Stacking the court with religious nuts.
Nothing like a slew of unobjective and truly activist right-wing fundies making legal decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. The right throws so many hissy fits, it's hard to remember them all
But indeed, here's a cozy little arrangement, no? Is this an appointment to a Minnesota state trial court? I'm not familiar with Minnesota's court set up, but if this is "just" a state trial court, it's probably less crucial than an appointment to the state court of appeals or supreme court. Also, if it's an appointment to fill a vacancy, governors do that in any number of states to fill unexpired terms of judges who retire, get kicked upstairs to an appellate court position, or die in office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The Right, they RAIL against the use of the courts, unless it suits them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC