Nuclear energy simply replaces petroleum in the same broken paradigm.
Nuclear is extractive and highly centralized. It involves all the energy/infrastructure dedicated to extracting it from a few locations, transporting it over long distances, processing it and then using it in plants that will always be vulnerable to accidents.
Nuclear proponents never address all the hidden costs involved in using nuclear fuel. Nor do they ever address the centralization and the perils of having nuclear energy done by private, profit seeking corporations.
We've seen there's a lack of regulation by government in the US. It's not as bad under Democrats but it's almost totally absent under Republicans. And no matter who is in charge politically, corporate executives are always keen on cutting costs and putting off maintenance.
The alternative. The only one for a sane society going forward, is waste to fuel.
Taking the local garbage to a local plant to create fuel and energy. It can be done by municipalities all over the country. Localized energy. No more relying being slaves to petroleum OR nuclear industries.
Long Island already does this. We are one of the greenest areas in the country regarding energy production. Denmark is doing it.
The facts are there in support of what I have just said.
Nuclear energy simply replaces petroleum in the same broken paradigm.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/13/science/earth/13trash.html