|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 06:37 PM Original message |
Second Japanese Nuclear Reactor At Risk of Exploding |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 06:42 PM Response to Original message |
1. This is what they consider protective gear for radiation : |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DODI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 06:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yes. All but gamma. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 06:58 PM Response to Reply #2 |
9. Can you tell what this means? In Japanse, Gamma dose measurements: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 06:44 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. So far the evacuation orders covers 300,000 people? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meow mix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 07:00 PM Response to Reply #3 |
10. thats the impression i was under as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paradoxical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 06:45 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. That's actually very effective. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 06:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Paper protects against radioactive cesium and radioactive iodine? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paradoxical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 06:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Paper will stop radioactive particles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 07:28 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Cecium and radioactive iodine=alpha or beta particles? Or..? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paradoxical (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 07:31 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. Beta particles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
somone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 07:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
16. Not much different from how workers handle enriched uranium: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
5. Misleading subject. The first reactor did not explode and there isnt a danger of the second reactor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 06:57 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. But you don't want a meltdown in a MOX reactor do you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 07:07 PM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Of course not. And it isnt impossible that the reactor itself could explode. But this article is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
denem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 07:13 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. It removes everything electronic, including monitoring. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 07:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. If true then you have a good point. nm |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cetacea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 07:03 PM Response to Reply #5 |
11. "Official says meltdown may be under way" CNN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 07:09 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I have read those reports and that is not good. Hopefully, they can stop the temp increase before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 07:14 PM Response to Reply #5 |
15. OP was quoting the headline of the link. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rhett o rick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 07:39 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. I am hoping they mean an explosion similar to the other plant in lieu of the reactor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hannah Bell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Mar-12-11 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
21. press conference some time ago: they are venting & pumping water in #3. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC