Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Nuclear Reactor on the shore?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
CanonRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 06:45 PM
Original message
A Nuclear Reactor on the shore?
I'm watching CNN and the pics of the failing Nuclear plant got me thinking. Who would build a nuclear facility on the ocean shore of a country that coined the word "tsunami". What the hell were they thinking?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. cooling water n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Davis_X_Machina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. The old Maine Yankee...
...Seabrook, Plymouth Pilgrim.... all along the shore.

You can get cold water for cooling, and an enormous body of cold water -- much larger than a river -- to dilute the hot water that comes out, especially if there's deep water close to shore.

And, so I am told, lobsters the size of Saint Bernards... :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. Several of the reactors in Florida are built on the shore or close to it
So they have access to water for cooling. The Crystal River reactor releases enough coolant water that manatees hang out near the reactor in the winter to take advantage of the increased water temperature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SugarShack Donating Member (979 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That is gulf coast and will never be a tsunami threat in there they said today...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jacquelope Donating Member (364 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. No tsunami threat? Really?
Any fool who says there'll never be a tsunami threat on any coast is... well.. foolish.

If I lived out there I'd move right now, for fear of nature teaching them a lesson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. One of the possible tsunami creators is massive releases of methane hydrates
Or Methane clathrate from the ocean floor. The Gulf of Mexico has a LOT of those deposits.

Clathrates as a cause of tsunamis

During the formation of gas hydrates, methane and water become immobilized within the sediment pore spaces. Because of the presence of these solids (instead of pore waters and gas), the sediment can not become consolidated because the water can not be expulsed with increasing overburden as more sedimentation occurs. Cementation of the sediments does not occur when pore spaces are filled with hydrates (solid ice) rather than with water, from which minerals such as calcite can be precipitated. Gas hydrate rich sediments are thus cemented by the hydrates, which may occupy much of the sedimentary section, but which are not stable when the temperature rises or the pressure falls.

This may lead to problems during continued sedimentation and further burial of the gas hydrates: the hydrates will become buried so deeply that the temperature will increase according to the regional geothermal gradient. The hydrates will then no longer be stable, and will disintegrate into a liquid water and gas mixture. The basal zone of the gas hydrate becomes under-consolidated, possibly over-pressured because of the release of the methane, leading to the development of a zone with low shear strength where failure could be triggered and massive landslides could occur. With the landslides, more gas could escape.

Several examples of possibly gas-hydrate linked extremely large slumps have been described, e.g., on the Norwegian continental margin (Bugge et al., 1987), where debris from the giant, three-part Storegga slide, over 450 m thick, is spread over a distance of 800 km. One of the Storegga slides caused a tsunami to deposit sediment up to 4 m above the high water line in Scotland (Nisbet and Piper, 1998). There are more of these mega slides in the same region (Laberg et al., 2000).

More about clathrates: http://ethomas.web.wesleyan.edu/ees123/clathrate.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. We'll I haven't been very strong pro or anti nuclear power
But building them on inherently unstable land and guiding 55 of them on that little island just doesn't seem to be the best choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Plants ARE built by the shore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. We would. My nuclear plant
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 06:56 PM by Cleita
El Diablo. Not only that it is practically sitting on two faults including the famous San Andreas fault. Now I call that stupid.

Nevermind the picture. The link doesn't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Here's the picture:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. We've got Diablo Canyon and San Onofre by the shore here in SoCal.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. NH has the smallest coastline of any costal state, and Seabrook takes
sits on 900 acres on the southern edge of our 18 miles of coast.

We fought it for years,- but in the end we couldn't keep it from going online.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC