Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OMG!!! - Sarah Palin Uses Info Gleaned From 'Treasonous' WikiLeaks To Pen Op-Ed On Dangers Of Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 05:39 PM
Original message
OMG!!! - Sarah Palin Uses Info Gleaned From 'Treasonous' WikiLeaks To Pen Op-Ed On Dangers Of Iran
Edited on Thu Dec-23-10 05:40 PM by kpete
Sarah Palin Uses Info Gleaned From 'Treasonous' WikiLeaks To Pen Op-Ed On Dangers Of Iran

The Huffington Post | Nick Wing First Posted: 12-22-10 01:00 PM | Updated: 12-22-10

Sarah Palin sought to build her foreign policy credentials on Tuesday, with a new op-ed arguing that the Obama administration needs to "toughen up" on Iran based on information from leaked diplomatic cables that she had earlier denounced.

The former Alaska Governor writes in USA Today:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2010-12-22-column22_ST2_N.htm

Iran continues to defy the international community in its drive to acquire nuclear weapons. Arab leaders in the region rightly fear a nuclear-armed Iran. We suspected this before, but now we know for sure because of leaked diplomatic cables. King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia "frequently exhorted the U.S. to attack Iran to put an end to its nuclear weapons program," according to these communications. Officials from Jordan said the Iranian nuclear program should be stopped by any means necessary. Officials from the United Arab Emirates and Egypt saw Iran as evil, an "existential threat" and a sponsor of terrorism. If Iran isn't stopped from obtaining nuclear weapons, it could trigger a regional nuclear arms race in which these countries would seek their own nuclear weapons to protect themselves.


The "leaked diplomatic cables" that Palin speaks of are, of course, dispatches released as part of WikiLeaks' latest document dump, an action that she deemed "treasonous," later asking why the group's founder, Julian Assange, was not "pursued with the same urgency we pursue al Qaeda and Taliban leaders."

more:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/22/sarah-palin-wikileaks-iran-op-ed_n_800285.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow. That kind of stupid doesn't just burn...
it incinerates. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Allow me to join you.
:banghead: I can't understand how anyone --- anyone --- even the hugh moran thinks this woman is qualified for ANY office, much less President. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikekj Donating Member (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Actually,
I really don't see a problem here. Yes, it was confidential information at one time. Now it is in the public domain. Everyone now has access to that information.

I don't like the fact that it was leaked, but, you just can't put the genie back in the bottle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Either way she negates her own argument against Wikileaks.
Edited on Thu Dec-23-10 07:16 PM by CJCRANE
Either it's treasonous to release and dangerous to discuss the information or...in fact the information is quite useful and helps add to the public debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Honestly?
She doesn't even question if the information is valid.


Hypocrisy means nothing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Horsepucky. Gov. Quitter (R) condemns the leaks, then profits from them
Typical Republicon BS hypocrisy, and failure to accept responsibility for actions. As the republicons demonstrate over and over, avoidance of responsibility is their main Family Value
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Or the idiot back in Alaska nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-24-10 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. As others have pointed out the "stupid" is in Palin ranting against the leaks and then, when
it suits her, USING the information in the leaked documents for one of her other rants. :banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. You don't like the fact that it was leaked? Explain why if you don't
mind? Wikileaks is an award-winning International News Organization. The actions of this government affect people around the world, most of the time, adversely. The American people have a right to know what their government is doing in their name, such as illegally killing and torturing people. Any news organization that has information exposing corruption and does not publish it, becomes complicit in those crimes.

If we don't want to see these kinds of revelations, then how about restoring the rule of law in this country and we will have nothing to worry about?

But I'd love to hear your rationale as to why we should suppress and censor the news?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. Proper grammar, intelligent writing. Sarah didn't write it
She just signed her name to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. And the Hypocrite of the Year award goes to...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
4. -insert- Todd's cock joke -uninsert-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
7. Republicon Family Hypsocrisy
as usual...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-23-10 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Teh defintion of moran. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
14. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC