Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reuters Analysis: How bad is the nuclear accident in Japan?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 03:05 PM
Original message
Reuters Analysis: How bad is the nuclear accident in Japan?
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 03:06 PM by 1776Forever
Source: Reuters

By Scott DiSavino

NEW YORK | Sat Mar 12, 2011 2:47pm EST

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Japanese nuclear safety agency rated the damage at a nuclear power plant at Fukushima at a four on a scale of one to seven, which is not quite as bad as the Three Mile Island accident in the United States in 1979, which registered a five. But what does that mean?

The International Atomic Energy Agency -- an inter-governmental organization for scientific co-operation in the nuclear field -- said it uses the scale to communicate to the public in a consistent way the safety significance of nuclear and radiological events.

The International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale, or INES, ranges from one to seven with the most serious being a seven referred to as a "major accident", while a one is an "anomaly". The scale is designed so the severity of an event is about ten times greater for each increase in level.

(more at link)

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/12/us-japan-quake-nuclear-us-idUSTRE72B2UN20110312
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. "not quite as bad as the Three Mile Island"
YET.

wow. this is a real wtf moment. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If the containment vesel holds
it will not be as bad as TMI. If it does not... it could easily surpass it.

This is where we are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How many barriers do they have in place to stop radiation from
leaking out?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. It is the engineering
those things are tested for a LOT of stresses... but it is the combo that concerns me, from the quake itself, aftershocks and heat.

But essentially the reactor itself is inside a vessel



What blew was the external wall, but the internal is intact from what I can tell. This is a generic diagram for a civilian reactor by the way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. "yet" indeed. No way this is over.
It ain't over till it's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. It is already cooling down with the sea water
so hope that works and keeps working... we might be able to step away from this one... the reactor is cooked as far as producing power either way though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Too early to tell. But I hope they are right.
The situation is still evolving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. IAEA say they believe core is contained and rad levels are down
#
2039: Ian Hore-Lacy of the World Nuclear Association told the BBC he believes the situation at the nuclear power plant - where sea water is being used to cool the reactor core - is under control: "The point is that the heat, decay heat from the fuel drops off very rapidly. So after an hour, an hour following the shut down, it's down to about 2 or 3% I think. And after 24 hours it's down to half a per cent. So the amount of heat you've got to cope with right now is a small fraction of what there was initially."

#
2023: Reuters: The IAEA says the operator of the plant has confirmed that the primary containment vessel is intact following this morning's blast.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12307698

A nuke expert on BBCTV just added that the next critical juncture will be in 10-15 hours, but that he doesn't expect a worsening in the situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. IAEA says the operator of the plant has confirmed ...
Edited on Sat Mar-12-11 04:18 PM by denem
Ian Hore-Lacy of the World Nuclear Association ... believes

They have no one on site.! OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
10. Not Bad Enough to Stop the Madness Once and For All
For that, we would need to either wipe out all human life on the planet, or just traumatize all the Stupids into swearing off "quick and dirty fixes" to insatiable energy wasting.

Of course, it's not over yet, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. Update from Reuters: Rating was before the problems with reactor 3.
http://live.reuters.com/Event/Japan_earthquake2

Japan's nuclear agency has rated the incident a 4 according to the International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale. Three Mile Island was rated 5, and Chernobyl was a 7. However, this rating was before the problems with reactor 3.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJvR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. So...
...blowing half the plant into orbit is less of a screwup than TMI...? Go swim in Lake Karachay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-12-11 07:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I am just the messenger. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJvR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-13-11 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Not aimed at you. Unless you rated it... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC