dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-23-10 07:11 PM
Original message |
Tweety asking if Pete Rouse is the difference maker. Maybe Rahm sucked? |
|
Edited on Thu Dec-23-10 07:49 PM by dkf
Food for thought.
Rouse has been Chief of Staff since October 1, 2010
|
The Wielding Truth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-23-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |
Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-23-10 07:33 PM
Response to Original message |
2. Oh, come on Tweety, we all KNOW Rahm sucked |
|
and most of us were clapping and cheering when his ambition got him the hell out of his office in the White House. Not only did things start to get done, but Gibbsie hasn't been shooting from the lip about the mean old liberals now that he doesn't have an adjacent office.
The mean old liberals were right again: an abrasive conservative really wasn't the best person in the world to have as Chief of Staff.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-23-10 07:54 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Andrea Mitchell has said Biden is the point man, so maybe with Rahm gone |
|
it's more democratic -- Obama, Biden, Rouse? Nice blend of opinions/input.
|
FLAprogressive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-23-10 07:57 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I knew that picking Rahm would be a disaster from day one. He was in it for himself. |
Skink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-23-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I want Rahm back if this is the new approach. |
dkf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Dec-23-10 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Well you just may get your wish yet. The Republicans won't want to give him any more legislative victories anyway. You just have to hope for their cooperation.
I like what he is doing so I am hoping we see a House and Senate that can get things done.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:16 PM
Response to Original message |