Groundbreaking New UN Report on How to Feed the World's Hungry: Ditch Corp-Controlled Agriculture

[kpete]

Groundbreaking New UN Report on How to Feed the World's Hungry: Ditch Corporate-Controlled Agriculture
A new report from the UN advises ditching corporate-controlled and chemically intensive farming in favor of agroecology.
March 8, 2011 |



There are a billion hungry people in the world and that number could rise as food insecurity increases along with population growth, economic fallout and environmental crises. But a roadmap to defeating hunger exists, if we can follow the course -- and that course involves ditching corporate-controlled, chemical-intensive farming.

"To feed 9 billion people in 2050, we urgently need to adopt the most efficient farming techniques available. And today's scientific evidence demonstrates that agroecological methods outperform the use of chemical fertilizers in boosting food production in regions where the hungry live," says Olivier de Schutter, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food. Agroecology is more or less what many Americans would simply call "organic agriculture," although important nuances separate the two terms.

Used successfully by peasant farmers worldwide, agroecology applies ecology to agriculture in order to optimize long-term food production, requiring few purchased inputs and increasing soil quality, carbon sequestration and biodiversity over time. Agroecology also values traditional and indigenous farming methods, studying the scientific principals underpinning them instead of merely seeking to replace them with new technologies. As such, agroecology is grounded in local (material, cultural and intellectual) resources.

A new report,http://www.srfood.org/ presented today before the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva, makes several important points along with its recommendation of agroecology. For example, it says, "We won't solve hunger and stop climate change with industrial farming on large plantations." Instead, it says the solution lies with smallholder farmers. The majority of the world's hungry are smallholder farmers, capable of growing food but currently not growing enough food to feed their families each year. A net global increase in food production alone will not guarantee the end of hunger (as the poor cannot access food even when it is available), an increase in productivity for poor farmers will make a dent in global hunger. Potentially, gains in productivity by smallholder farmers will provide an income to farmers as well, if they grow a surplus of food that they can sell.

...........

the rest:
http://www.alternet.org/food/150158/groundbreaking_new_un_report_on_how_to_feed_the_world%27s_hungry%3A_ditch_corporate-controlled_agriculture/

[ananda]

1. Agroecology!

Cool.

[WatsonT]

2. Ending food aid would help

and getting rid of bio-ethanol.

[Countdown_3_2_1]

3. And where would these farms be located? Rainforests? Deserts?

A billion people feeding themselves by farming the land. That's a lot of acreage we're talking about.

[Frustratedlady]

5. Did you notice all the greenhouses that were wiped out by the tsunami?

On smaller lands/islands, much of the food is raised in greenhouses, either in soil or hydroponically. You would not believe the yields you can get.

We must get away from raping the soil as corporate farming does. Of course, they have wiped out most of the family farmers. It is a tragedy what they have done to the countrysides and to our food.

I would rather have taste and safe food than produce that will look fresh a month after it has been picked and shipped. It is a crapshoot to find fruit and veggies that have the freshly picked taste, but it can be done when purchased locally or within a 400-mile radius+/-.

I look for people to go back to backyard gardening, where possible.

[Sal Minella]

6. We can start by growing real food on the land now usurped by

GigantoAgriCorp Genetically-Mutilated Pseudo-Foods Inc.

Real people growing real food may be a novel idea to some, but it worked for millennia and can work again.

[wildbilln864]

4. k&r! nt

[CanSocDem]

7. Yes Indeed!!

The CorporateFoodIndustryInc. just pretends to market food. What their real interest is, is the production of PROFITS. This leads to all sorts of 'inequality' in the marketplace. And the value of real food is diminished.

This could be a really hard sell....

.

[SpiralHawk]

8. The k and the r

eom

[JohnyCanuck]

9. kick n/t