CNN Nuclear Experts cannot explain smoke from reactor #1

[itsrobert]

They cannot speak to that at this time. Their baffled.

[nadinbrzezinski]

1. I just went to NHK

[Poll_Blind]

2. I'll bet. It's probably just a cup of coffee left in the microwave too long.

PB

[Bonobo]

3. CNN is stunningly pathetic. nt

[FourScore]

4. It is baffling. That one was getting under control. n/t

[cbdo2007]

5. Of course not - that would be like describing a football game from a blimp in a domed stadium.

They woudl be baffled as well.

[jannyk]

6. Tell them to switch on BBC!

[thewiseguy]

7. You mean smoke from reactor number 3?

[cliffordu]

8. "news" organizations in this country are showing just how shallow and callow

they really are.

Disgusting.

[Cetacea]

9. The smoke appears much more intense than No. 1

"Low chance that mass radiation has leaked". 9:55

[Scuba]

10. CNN Experts cannon explain why the word "news" is part of their name. n/t

[SpiralHawk]

13. They plan to replace the word 'news' with 'spin'

in the interests of spin

[Lastactiongyro]

11. I went to Al Jazeera, found out what their opinion was

http://english.aljazeera.net/watch_now/

Highly interesting 3 energy experts one a female Muslim Professor. Great conversation.

[jtuck004]

12. That sure dissipates like steam, not smoke. Which would explain

why they are getting cooling water in but the level in their gauges is not rising, as they said in the conference.

Not a happy thought, but the alternative is watching the explosion of the final containment, or letting the fuel melt into the ground under the reactor.