|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:19 PM Original message |
Straight up...do YOU believe that Bradley Manning deserves this treatment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. No and Hell No...He's not been convincted of anything. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:16 AM Response to Reply #1 |
48. there is a very well known murder case.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:08 AM Response to Reply #48 |
102. This isn't about "sleeping nude"! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
whathehell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:31 AM Response to Reply #48 |
111. What was his name? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
emilyg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
2. No. A million times NO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OneHalfNote (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. I don't believe any human deserves that treatment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
4. I think he deserves a medal and a statue on the D.C. Mall for public service. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 05:01 PM Response to Reply #4 |
166. OT somewhat, but Daniel Ellsburg has famously said that we will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NoTimeToulouse (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. No. Of course not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:39 PM Response to Reply #5 |
21. he has access to legal counsel, and has had access for quite some time- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:16 AM Response to Reply #21 |
104. Mere detainment isn't the issue, it's the *treatment*. The nudity without the benefit of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 07:34 AM Response to Reply #104 |
118. did you read the link to information from his own attorney? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 06:27 PM Response to Reply #118 |
169. I get my "claims" from reading about his treatment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluerthanblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 08:47 PM Response to Reply #169 |
172. the articles you cite are fine .. but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 09:06 PM Response to Reply #172 |
174. I was unaware that there are prison sentences of "life in solitary". Have we sunk THAT far? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 09:16 PM Response to Reply #172 |
175. Please see my post at #102 for updated info. The info you gave is from 12/10. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jwirr (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
6. NO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
7. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CaliforniaPeggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
8. Not just no.........FUCK NO. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:25 PM Response to Original message |
9. No! Due process without torture. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
csziggy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:27 PM Response to Original message |
10. No, no one does whether or not they have already been found guilty |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:28 PM Response to Original message |
11. No. I will not be voting for Obama in 2012 because of this issue - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BillyJack (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
12. NO - his treatment is an abomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Poll_Blind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:29 PM Response to Original message |
13. NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gemini Cat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:30 PM Response to Original message |
14. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:21 AM Response to Reply #14 |
106. Apparently by minimizing torturous acts as though it's just another day in the Mayberry jail. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1monster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:31 PM Response to Original message |
15. No. Not under any circumstances. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maraya1969 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:34 PM Response to Original message |
16. NO!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
17. NO! Completely disagree with torture -- nation has always disagree with it -- so has military!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dawson Leery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
18. Under no circumstances is torture acceptable. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kas125 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
19. He absolutely does not! Nobody deserves such treatment, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Snoutport (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:38 PM Response to Original message |
20. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
22. NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Bacon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:41 PM Response to Original message |
23. NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:50 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Who? Obama doesn't know what's going on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BluegrassDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
24. Well that's what happens to treasoners |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BillyJack (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:46 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Manning didn't commit treason, he most likely EXPOSED the treason of others. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:48 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. Prove treason. Presumption of innocence. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shiver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:31 AM Response to Reply #28 |
110. Didn't he admit to doing it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hissyspit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:06 AM Response to Reply #110 |
116. Chat logs were released. They could be forged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
coalition_unwilling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:59 PM Response to Reply #24 |
37. Congratulations! You've just endorsed the use of torture as an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dixiegrrrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:35 AM Response to Reply #37 |
124. And mine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hong Kong Cavalier (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:07 PM Response to Reply #37 |
138. And mine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:21 AM Response to Reply #24 |
51. Have you checked to make sure you know the definition of "treasoner"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:53 AM Response to Reply #24 |
94. You mean they took away Harry Treasoner's underwear at night? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:01 AM Response to Reply #24 |
100. Deleted message |
walldude (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 08:17 AM Response to Reply #24 |
123. Really? So Cheney, Rove and Scooter Libby who outed a covert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neverforget (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:12 PM Response to Reply #24 |
141. You'll have your fair trial and then be shot! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
druidity33 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 06:29 PM Response to Reply #24 |
170. Dude... that's not even a word. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
midnight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
25. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinkkillersheep (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:46 PM Response to Original message |
27. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BillyJack (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:59 PM Response to Reply #27 |
38. Hey if you were Manning or a prisoner in Guantanemo (sp?) or just |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pinkkillersheep (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:38 AM Response to Reply #38 |
69. I do care and would be more than willing to fight for his legal rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hardcover (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
29. Yes. Obama answered this question straight up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mimosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:51 PM Response to Reply #29 |
33. And Obama wouldn't lie to us, would he? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:22 AM Response to Reply #29 |
52. No. He said he had been assured by the Pentagram that the treatment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:54 AM Response to Reply #29 |
95. You trust him when he says people DESERVE to be persecuted? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PassingFair (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 08:09 AM Response to Reply #29 |
120. Is that you, Brittney? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:50 PM Response to Original message |
31. no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lucinda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:51 PM Response to Original message |
32. Nope. And I don't see this as a progressive administration. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:53 PM Response to Original message |
34. Yes, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:25 AM Response to Reply #34 |
54. Manning’s Father Condemns Treatment of Imprisoned Son |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hamlette (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:15 AM Response to Reply #54 |
103. the article cherry picks the interview and its title is completely misleading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
veganlush (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
35. I don't know how he's being treated |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hardcover (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:08 AM Response to Reply #35 |
43. That is right. We don't know. I'm not going to take the word of a lawyer or a distraught father |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:34 AM Response to Reply #43 |
67. The Pentagon already copped to it. Try again. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:11 AM Response to Reply #67 |
80. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Travelman (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:06 PM Response to Reply #67 |
127. Copped to what? That he is on suicide watch? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:13 AM Response to Reply #43 |
81. They take his shorts away at night. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:51 AM Response to Reply #43 |
92. The Army ADMITTED they take his underwear away at night. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:55 AM Response to Reply #43 |
96. But you'd take the word of the military-industrial complex? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ananda (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
36. No, absolutely not! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeSwiss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Mar-13-11 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
39. Hell No! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:03 AM Response to Original message |
40. Deleted message |
BillyJack (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:08 AM Response to Reply #40 |
44. Oh give me a break......boooyah for the "sleep suit" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hardcover (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:14 AM Response to Reply #40 |
46. Even that story has falsehood in it. He NEVER had to be naked. He was allowed to keep his shorts on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:43 AM Response to Reply #46 |
75. Really? First Lt Brian Villiard states the brig commander decided otherwise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:36 AM Response to Reply #40 |
68. Deleted message |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:49 AM Response to Reply #40 |
90. He shouldn't be on suicide watch at all |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Travelman (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:26 PM Response to Reply #90 |
129. Yes, there is a good reason not to have his trial immediately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:58 PM Response to Reply #129 |
135. You've already convicted him in your mind |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Travelman (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:29 PM Response to Reply #135 |
142. Well, first you need to get your shit straight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:38 PM Response to Reply #142 |
145. You can't really compare Bradley Manning to Jared Loughner |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:39 PM Response to Reply #142 |
146. You called him a traitor. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Travelman (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #146 |
151. "Secrecy never helps the people." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:03 PM Response to Reply #151 |
153. Secrecy in GOVERNMENT...personal secrecy is different. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Travelman (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:46 PM Response to Reply #153 |
163. Oh. So now it's just government secrecy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 05:03 PM Response to Reply #163 |
168. All weaponry instructions are available by now anyway. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:30 AM Response to Reply #40 |
109. An apology because he now wears a dorky green potato sack?! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:06 AM Response to Original message |
41. Hell No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zanzoobar (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
42. I think of it like this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BillyJack (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:17 AM Response to Reply #42 |
49. Nope - he wasn't "taken to the bank" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zanzoobar (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:29 AM Response to Reply #49 |
59. 'splain, Ricky. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnroshan (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:40 AM Response to Reply #42 |
73. That is the most ignorant shit I've heard on DU... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zanzoobar (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:45 AM Response to Reply #73 |
78. Good luck changing military protocol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:58 AM Response to Reply #42 |
97. "he jumped into a meat grinder"? that's a pretty despicable thing to say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cecilfirefox (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:14 AM Response to Original message |
45. To be honest, there's stuff going on we may not know about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hardcover (109 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:17 AM Response to Reply #45 |
50. Finally, someone who makes sense. Except for the naked part. He was not naked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:32 AM Response to Reply #50 |
63. Yes, they are using forced nudity on him, just like in Abu Graib. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:29 AM Response to Reply #50 |
84. Will you stop the insistent bull---t already? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:50 AM Response to Reply #50 |
91. The Army ADMITTED they took away his underwear at night. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:59 AM Response to Reply #50 |
98. The army ADMITTED they took his underwear STOP LYING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:36 AM Response to Reply #50 |
112. Planet earth calling... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clio the Leo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:25 AM Response to Reply #45 |
55. "I really wish folks would stop treating him like a hero." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:29 AM Response to Reply #55 |
58. Even if the only thing he'd leaked was the video |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:26 AM Response to Reply #45 |
56. Punitive pre-trial detention is illegal in this country. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Travelman (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:13 PM Response to Reply #56 |
128. How utterly asinine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BillyJack (653 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:29 AM Response to Reply #45 |
60. "The man is a criminal" you say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cecilfirefox (404 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:32 AM Response to Reply #60 |
64. I do believe in that concept, BUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:38 AM Response to Reply #64 |
70. It's not just a "concept", it's the law. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:47 AM Response to Reply #45 |
89. He isn't a "criminal" unless he's actually been convicted of a crime. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jannyk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:15 AM Response to Original message |
47. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
steve2470 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
53. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libodem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
57. hell no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raksha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:30 AM Response to Original message |
61. Hell no!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
themadstork (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:31 AM Response to Original message |
62. No. And I don't give a flying fuck if it's a mlitary court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zanzoobar (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:42 AM Response to Reply #62 |
74. I was in the military |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
themadstork (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:25 PM Response to Reply #74 |
131. I mainly meant the way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chill_wind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:32 AM Response to Original message |
65. No. The unhumane treatment of Bradley Manning goes beyond the degrading forced nudity |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krabigirl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:34 AM Response to Original message |
66. No..he hasn't even been tried or convicted yet, but no, he doesn't deserve to be tortured! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:38 AM Response to Original message |
71. Absolutely not. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
highplainsdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:40 AM Response to Original message |
72. No. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:43 AM Response to Original message |
76. It is shameful. But the plutarchy can't have peasants exposing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Oilwellian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 12:45 AM Response to Original message |
77. No, he does not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ZombieHorde (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:10 AM Response to Original message |
79. I feel like I don't know what is going on. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
timtom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:15 AM Response to Original message |
82. Absolutely not! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beam Me Up (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:21 AM Response to Original message |
83. Absolutely not. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
85. Absolutely Not! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grahamhgreen (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:29 AM Response to Original message |
86. Not even if he's guilty of leaking the docs. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donheld (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:39 AM Response to Original message |
87. No! No excuses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Electric Monk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:40 AM Response to Original message |
88. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:51 AM Response to Original message |
93. Of course not, only a very few people here do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:00 AM Response to Reply #93 |
99. That's not my experience |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rex (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:05 AM Response to Reply #99 |
117. From your own thread, the 'nos' seem to have it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 08:01 AM Response to Reply #117 |
119. Agreed, torture has only a handful of supporters on DU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:02 PM Response to Reply #119 |
136. "torture has only a handful of supporters on DU"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:35 PM Response to Reply #117 |
134. I'm glad this response is happening in this thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:05 PM Response to Reply #134 |
137. Me too! /nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PufPuf23 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:06 AM Response to Original message |
101. No. The treatment is criminal regardless of Manning's guilt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
themadstork (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:21 PM Response to Reply #101 |
130. Yes, this. Our government is bound by the principles of human decency, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Betty Karlson (902 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:19 AM Response to Original message |
105. No. It's ahuman rights abuse |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Duende azul (608 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:25 AM Response to Original message |
107. No. Deserves a medal instead and a promotion. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TorchTheWitch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:26 AM Response to Original message |
108. I don't believe ANYONE deserves such treatment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
pacalo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:43 AM Response to Original message |
113. No. I used to think only backward-thinking third-world countries would stoop so low. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:35 PM Response to Reply #113 |
133. I used to believe we weren't a backward-thinking, third-world country. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JDPriestly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:48 AM Response to Original message |
114. I do not think that anyone deserves the treatment that Bradley Manning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
burrowowl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 02:52 AM Response to Original message |
115. NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mod mom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 08:12 AM Response to Original message |
121. Absolutely NOT! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hobbit709 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 08:16 AM Response to Original message |
122. NO. Even if convicted he doesn't deserve that kind of treatment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
riderinthestorm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
125. No!! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OhioChick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
126. No n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gkhouston (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
132. No. I wonder if they're trying to coerce a confession or induce a suicide. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bragi (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:09 PM Response to Reply #132 |
140. They want to break him and intimidate other whistleblowers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Aerows (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
139. No! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:36 PM Response to Original message |
143. Fuck no. It makes me sick. And people who support his torture make me sick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mochajava666 (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:37 PM Response to Original message |
144. It scares the Hell out of me that many on DU support torture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:41 PM Response to Reply #144 |
147. What's worse is that so many blindly trust the war machine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mochajava666 (771 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:47 PM Response to Reply #147 |
148. Well said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:59 PM Response to Reply #147 |
150. exactly right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
149. My take--so far the only issue I've seen is the clothes thing. If Manning were to committ suicide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:01 PM Response to Reply #149 |
152. The ARMY shrink ruled a month ago that Manning wasn't suicidal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:07 PM Response to Reply #152 |
155. Probably because he openly made a remark |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:08 PM Response to Reply #155 |
156. He said that BEFORE the shrink's ruling, and has repeatedly stated he was just being sarcastic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:10 PM Response to Reply #156 |
158. If I make a comment about a bomb on a plane |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:12 PM Response to Reply #158 |
159. This isn't the same thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Travelman (326 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:53 PM Response to Reply #159 |
164. No one is using suicide watch as an additional punishment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ken Burch (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:58 PM Response to Reply #164 |
165. So what are you saying....that Manning has to be kept on suicide watch for the REST of his time in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elias49 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 09:05 PM Response to Reply #164 |
173. Oh heavens no! Suicide would not do! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sallysense (25 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
154. Another letter sent to the President and other Officials. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
al bupp (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
157. Hell, no! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mojeoux (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
160. No No No No No No and NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
City Lights (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:15 PM Response to Original message |
161. Nope! nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
okieinpain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
162. of course he does't but he put his dumb butt in the situation so I |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zorahopkins (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 05:03 PM Response to Original message |
167. NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
171. NO... but those wishing this treatment on him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dhpgetsit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Mar-14-11 10:28 PM Response to Original message |
176. NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:45 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » General Discussion |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC