Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama published editorial in Arizona about guns

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:02 PM
Original message
Obama published editorial in Arizona about guns
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 12:06 PM by HereSince1628
No editorial in WI regarding protection of UN recognized Human Right to Collective Bargaining.

Everyone is endangered by bad guys with guns. But attacks in 15 states on workers rights are...

...well, ya know it's only 15 states, and ya know, we're more afraid of guns than the domestic threat of fascism!


Well, considering how long it's been since Gabriel Giffords was shot, maybe we're just impatient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. got a link?
this OP is nothing without the link.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Comments on MSNBC...but
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. Did Obama make any public comments about Wisconsin?
It's a rhetorical question, but most hysterical DUers are so poorly informed, that I'll answer the question: Yes, he did. He came out strongly in support of the unions.

Give it a rest. This isn't Obama's fault. You'd like to blame someone other than the voters of Wisconsin, but the blame is squarely in their laps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. He did not come out strongly in support of anything.
He said "from what he is hearing" "it seems like" an assault on unions. You call that strong? He said in that same statement that not "all" of budget problems could be blamed on unions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Sigh. Your lack of being informed is not his fault, either.
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 12:52 PM by Buzz Clik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. +1
I'm really getting tired of the hate overriding everything else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
former9thward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Sign. Where did you think I got that quote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
18. Good lord, did you read this POS article...the only quote from Obama is the "seems"
quote...they pretty much made up this article to make it sound more threatening and controversial...nice try...but try reading past the headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Did you read all four pages of that "POS" article?
I get the feeling that you are one of those who reads only the portions that support your negative outlook.

This was not Obama's fight, but he thrust his support into it. Obama did not vote in a GOP governor and Republican state legislature, nor can he reverse that election. He cannot send in the National Guard or make threats or do one goddam thing to change the course of events in Wisconsin. The voters set all that in motion, and they are reaping their rewards.

So stop. Just stop. You are sounding like a shrill, uninformed teabagger. Ignorance of the political realities is no excuse for making stupid comments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. He certainly didn't publish any editorials.
meh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No books, either. So?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Sew? Sew buttons on yer underwear and velco will still work better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. It isn't his fault, but he sure hasn't helped
in fact, when it was possible to help, help was denied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. His commentary concerns federal gun control, which is a federal issue
HTH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. And a coordinated multi-state attack on civil rights isn't.
I got that. That comes down to parsing exactly WHAT is a national concern for the effective head of a national party.

Rationalize and apologize, we've all got the right to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Please show where anything in federal law guarantees collective bargaining rights to state employees
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 01:20 PM by slackmaster
TIA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The US is a co-signatory of the UN Human Rights accords
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 02:01 PM by HereSince1628
Collective bargaining is therein, a recognized HUMAN RIGHT.

And even if you are one of those southern Reagan Democrat types you should be aware that RONALD REAGAN HIMSELF SAID THAT DEMOCRACY CANNOT EXIST WHERE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IS BANNED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I meant something that actually carries the force of law within the USA
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 02:42 PM by slackmaster
But thanks for playing.

United States Constitution

Article VI

All debts contracted and engagements entered into, before the adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Treaties of the United States ARE LAW.
Go FISH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. An international accord isn't a treaty until it's ratified by a 2/3 vote in the United States Senate
The Constitution, HereSince1628.

Have you read it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. When did the US Senate ratify the UN Human Rights Accords?
;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Upton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. "I believe that the Second Amendment guarantees an individual right to bear arms."
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. We DO NOT NEED TO THREATEN ANYONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC