FourScore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:34 PM
Original message |
Radiation could reach Tokyo within 10 hours |
|
Edited on Mon Mar-14-11 10:34 PM by FourScore
Source: CBSNews Tweet
CBSNews French Embassy says low-level radioactive wind from the nuclear reactor in could reach Tokyo within 10 hours #japan Disaster in Japan - CBS News - cbsnews.com Twitter - 163 2 minutes ago
Read more: CBS News - cbsnews.com
|
doc03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:37 PM
Response to Original message |
1. I just read minutes ago radiation levels are 9 times normal in |
|
Tokyo already. With all the conflicting information coming out of Japan I could swear BP is in charge over there.
|
Teaser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. 9 times above normal may not be that bad |
|
don't know what Tokyo's background level is. It could fluctuate that much, or near that much, regularly.
|
doc03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. There were several reports over the weekend that levels were |
|
1000 times normal at the reactor and that wasn't of any real concern acording to (experts?).
|
FourScore
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Those reports were of levels inside the reactor. Not outside. n/t |
krispos42
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. Well, radiation is a matter of accumation. |
|
1,000x isn't any real concern... as long as you leave immediately.
It also depends on the kind.
|
doc03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #11 |
12. How would that compare with a CT scan? |
krispos42
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-11 08:01 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
14. Probably a lot less than 1000x |
|
The sensors are extremely sensitive. We've learned a lot building astronomical telescopes of various kinds over the years, and I think it's safe to assume that a lot of that has been adapted to things other than studying quasars.
CT scans are also focused pretty tightly, so the amount of radiation per, say, cubic inch I don't think its that great.
But I don't know for certain; I only play a radiographer on TV... :-)
|
Statistical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-11 08:06 AM
Response to Reply #14 |
15. Sadly not true. A CT scan is much much much more radiation. |
|
Normal radiation is about 2.4mSv per year. That works out to ~ 0.00027397 mSv per hour.
1000x normal is bad but it is only 0.27mSv. So if you stayed in 1000x normal levels for 4 hours you would add about 1mSv to your annual dose. Now obviously you can't live in 1000x normal but short exposures are not lethal. It takes about a +100mSv increase before cancer rates are statistically increased.
Back to that CT scan. Depending on the type, area, and detail needed you can get 6mSv to 50mSv of radiation. At the high end one CT scan would be equivelent of staying in that 1000x normal zone for 185 hours.
|
krispos42
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
|
Thank you very much. Is this why they tend to use MRI scans instead?
|
doc03
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-15-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
17. I have heard CT scans were bad, I didn't know |
|
they were that bad. I took 5 of them, one every 6 months for two years observing a spot on my lung. Last time the doc finally decided to just give me an x-ray once a year. So if I take your worst case I spent the equivalent of 2 1/2 years at 1000x normal. I have had a couple other CT scans for an other problem so you could round it out to 3 years. So that's that green glow I see at night.
|
flamingdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:37 PM
Response to Original message |
2. CNN: If they are making the announcement to be sheltered, and further away |
|
this suggests a much greater seriousness and it's out of character for the govt.
Gupta says: a change of tone speaking to Anderson Cooper
Jeez they are 60 kilometers away, wonder if they are thinking of getting out of there..
|
Cetacea
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. I read somewhere that Cooper left. |
|
And I believe he was 100 miles out.
|
flamingdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. It's on right now and he seems to have the latest news |
|
and he's discussing the PM's statement with Gupta, but that could have been an hour ago.. and I bet he's further away now.
|
rocktivity
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:38 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I think the smartest course of action is to assume the worst |
|
There's no telling what the real truth is.
:( rocktivity
|
Ex Lurker
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:41 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I believe they're upwind nt. |
flamingdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. AC tweeted that he was outthere for safety concerns for the 2nd hour of the show |
|
andersoncooper Anderson Cooper Due to safety concerns we are leaving this area an therefore not live for the second hour
|
Tsiyu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-14-11 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Air China has cancelled flights |
|
Air China, the country's flag carrier, has cancelled flights from Beijing and Shanghai to Tokyo on Tuesday afternoon and in the evening.0337: A low level radioactive wind could reach Tokyo in 10 hours, Reuters is quoting the French embassy in the Japanese capital as saying.
bbc
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:24 PM
Response to Original message |