Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

23 US reactors share design with failed Japan nukes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
riverwalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:56 PM
Original message
23 US reactors share design with failed Japan nukes
(This is unbelievable. They knew about this in 1985!!!!!!!!) :grr: :grr:



http://www.gazette.com/articles/reactors-114501-mark-failed.html

March 14, 2011
CHRIS KNAP
THE ORANGE COUNTY (CALIF.) REGISTER

There are 23 nuclear power plants operating in the U.S. using the same General Electric Mark 1 reactors as the Fukushima Daiichi Unit 1 that suffered a hydrogen explosion on Saturday and then again early Monday, according to a fact sheet just released by the Nuclear Information and Resource Service, a Maryland-based nuclear power watchdog group.

This design, a General Electric Mark I, has been criticized by nuclear experts and even Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff for decades as being susceptible to explosion and containment failure.

Read more: http://www.gazette.com/articles/reactors-114501-mark-failed.html#ixzz1GdnWlInx
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-14-11 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. hmmm....how close to the San Andreas Fault?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Diablo Canyon and San Onofre in California are Westinghouse Pressurized Water Reactors...
...not boiling water reactors, like the General Electric Mark I

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Control-Z Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Is that any better? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well for starters it has solid dry containment not the wet torus system designed by GE to save money
Also PWR operated under much higher pressure making water boil off in the primary loop more difficult.

Still they are gnerally the same. Old 1960s era technology. Newer designs are much safer but sadly only China is building newer designs in any large number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yes. About 70% of new reactors are pressurized.
Pressurized Water Reactors, PWRs, are generally regarded as safer than the older Boiling Water Reactors, BWRs.

"Environmental campaign groups say that the boiling water reactors are more vulnerable to explosion because human intervention is needed to vent radioactive steam in the event of a core meltdown."

Most of the articles I've been reading support that.

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. It's Gotta Really Suck to Be the Human That Has to Do the Intervention
human intervention is needed to vent radioactive steam in the event of a core meltdown


Some jobs really should be done by machines! Like this one.

What happened to all those neat robots they're building over there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC