Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Cullen) Democrat wants to eliminate fleeing as option to hold up votes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:11 PM
Original message
(Cullen) Democrat wants to eliminate fleeing as option to hold up votes
Edited on Tue Mar-15-11 01:19 PM by cal04
http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/118016999.html

A Democratic state senator wants to make it impossible for senators in the future to block legislative action by leaving the state.

Sen. Tim Cullen of Janesville was one of the 14 Democrats in the Senate who sought unsuccessfully to block Gov. Scott Walker's budget repair law by driving to Illinois on Feb. 17 and only returning last week. That law drew massive protests by repealing most collective bargaining by public employees in the state.

"The main point I want to make is that what we did we had every legal right to do. It was an extraordinary step against an extraordinary bill," Cullen said. But "the institution of the Senate is not well-served going forward by having this particular avenue available."

Cullen said his proposal for a constitutional amendment would simply eliminate the requirement currently in the state constitution that three-fifths of state senators be present for the body to vote on certain fiscal bills, including those that contain spending items.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can someone recall this chucklefuck too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhiteTara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. he needs to be! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Boswell Donating Member (257 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. now if he was proposing an alternative
a way to stop future "extraordinary" bills he might have a point
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. So he is in favor of the walker takeover
idiot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. I always have to avert my gaze...
Edited on Tue Mar-15-11 01:18 PM by liberalmuse
whenever I see a Democrat down on his knees to service the Republicans for no damn good reason whatsoever. How embarrassing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. He was the weakest link of the 14 and he didn't want to leave in the first place.
Now he's rewarding Walker's thuggery. Why not have Fitzgerald declare it illegal, since he's apparently knighted himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
7. Extraordinary situations call for extraordinary responses, Tim
If you can guarantee that the Republicans will quit their bugfuck insane legislating, yeah, go ahead and change the state constitution. But when an entire majority caucus lines up behind a bugfuck insane proposal, you've got to have some way of reining them in. So as long as you're thinking of re-writing the state constitution, Tim, put in an amendment banning bugfuck insane legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. And they had an ugly deeply hidden agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawson Leery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
9. Recall him too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sounds like he's trying to do away with the quorum requirement, or am I reading this wrong?nt
I honestly don't get his point. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC