Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reuters FLASH: TEPCO considering dispersing boric acid over Daiichi No.4 plant from a helicopter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 06:50 PM
Original message
Reuters FLASH: TEPCO considering dispersing boric acid over Daiichi No.4 plant from a helicopter
Edited on Tue Mar-15-11 06:57 PM by MelissaB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Isn't that what they did at Chernobyl?
I think I recall reading that once.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They even dumped liquid nitrogen into Chernobyl. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I wondered about liquid nitrogen, myself....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. it seems that nitrogen is actually used routinely in at least some of the plants
Edited on Tue Mar-15-11 07:08 PM by Hannah Bell
in question, can't remember where i saw that, i'll check.

as a neutron (?) absorber/nullifier or something like that.

edit: it was in the press conference given by the guy who designed some of the containment vessels, professor goto (now a nuke opponent).

here:

to counteract this design of containment vehicle is one where you can insert nitrogen into the containment vessel

when you vent gases inside containment vessel you also get rid of nitrogen with hydrogen

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x639624

that might have supposed to have read "get rid of H with N".

there was something else, too, about boric acid used with some designs, N with others, i think...

i was trying to keep up with the speaking so not 100% accurate record

joke in japan now: "it's a miracle! everyone has suddenly turned into nuclear physicists!"

:>)

but i guess it's how we learn things....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lastactiongyro Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. No, they dug a tunnel undeneath and built a room under the melt, then
in the room they intended to put a liquid nitogen unit. But it never happened.. Instead they filled it with concrete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I think I read that, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I looked and Wikipedia says they dropped sand, lead, and boric acid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lastactiongyro Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. in that early phase about 600 plots were exposed to high to lethal doses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lastactiongyro Donating Member (254 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Eventually 500,000 men were exposed to high to lethal doses in the
battle of Chernobyl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Another link:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good luck to the Pilot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. According to this report, it has gone out all by itself
#
2327: Minoru Ogoda, a spokesman for the Japanese nuclear safety agency, tells AFP: "We have received information from that the fire and smoke is now invisible and it appears to have gone out of its own accord." An explosion on Tuesday morning damaged reactor 4's building and sparked a fire in its spent fuel storage pond. The reactor had been shut down before Friday's earthquake for maintenance, but its spent nuclear fuel rods were stored on the site.

meanwhile......

#
2334: Meanwhile the Tokyo Electric Power Company has said an estimated 70% of the nuclear fuel rods inside reactor 1 at Fukushima Daiichi have been damaged, along with 33% of the rods inside reactor 2, the Kyodo news agency reports. The reactors' cores are believed to have melted partially when their cooling systems malfunctioned.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12307698
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. I don't think the boric acid was to douse the fire
I think the idea is to keep neutron multiplication down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Yes, I know....but I thought the info might interest some - anyhow...
#
2359: Back to the ongoing crisis at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant: the Kyodo news agency reports that engineers are spraying boric acid to prevent "recriticality" - presumably, the resumption of a self-sustaining nuclear chain reaction - at reactor 4.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-12307698
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Forgive me for misunderstanding then.
I simply missed your intention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. I did, too, and am so glad he explained. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. So the fire is out and they are spraying to prevent "recriticality"?
I'm not sure what that means...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. I had to ask about that myself
I was told by a friend at NASA it's a when a criticality accident reoccurs. I kid you not. That was her idea of an explanation.

So, I googled and found it in Wikipedia.


A criticality accident, sometimes referred to as an excursion or a power excursion, is an accidental increasing nuclear chain reaction in a fissile material, such as enriched uranium or plutonium. This releases a surge of neutron radiation which is highly dangerous to humans and causes induced radioactivity in the surroundings.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticality_accident

I hope that helps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #11
21. You're correct. Boric acid is what's called a "neutron poison."
For the uninitiated, that means that it absorbs stray neutrons, strangling nuclear reactions which depend on neutron propagation, such as fission. It's normally used in the storage of spent fuel rods, but in this case it could be used to try and kill the reactor core.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
28. So does this mean that the spent fuel rods are exposed and on fire in #4?
Edited on Tue Mar-15-11 07:59 PM by nc4bo
Would anyone consider this a confirmation?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. They've pretty much admitted as much
This is about last nights fire, not the most recent one.

On Tuesday morning, an explosion was heard and the roof of the building that houses the No.4 reactor was damaged. Tokyo Electric Power, the operator of the plant, says it appears a lack of coolant caused the fuel rods to be exposed, adding that a hydrogen explosion might have occurred.
If the reactor can't be cooled, the fuel rods may emit hydrogen or melt down. Tokyo Electric Power considering pouring water onto the storage pool in the containment vessel through a hole on the roof created by the blast.

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/16_05.html

However, I'm not sure how they plan on getting the boric acid on the spent fuel. They say the hole in the roof is dozens of meters away from the storage pool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. It started again
http://english.kyodonews.jp/news/2011/03/78383.html

They don't know quite what to do about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. The report of it 'going out' was the fire you posted. Latest News on BBC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. There is too much conflicting information going on. No news from Kyodo that it has gone out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yo_Mama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #13
31. Well people who are local are reporting a smoke plume
Edited on Tue Mar-15-11 08:42 PM by Yo_Mama
Breaking news at Kyodo.

General link:
http://english.kyodonews.jp/

SOMETHING is on fire over there. This reminds me of the Fed talking about "containment" of the financial breakdown early in the progression. It got to be quite a joke.

(Edit) What I really mean is that this "fire" is starting and going out all by itself.

TEPCO doesn't seem to be getting close enough to put water on it; the best guess is that the hydrogen accumulates and ignites, and then flammables burn out, and then the cycle starts all over again. Because this morning at 5:45 they reported smoke and flames, and then when they tried to get closer the flames were gone, and then it is apparent that activity picked up again.

I haven't seen any reports of radiation levels at the plant for a very long time, but TEPCO did say that it can't pour water on it from the ground due to high radiation levels, so the next theory is boric acid coverage. This seems to be a serious and ongoing problem. Also since this thing is on the fourth floor, eventually you have to worry about the whole tank falling down. If it gets hot enough, I would think there could eventually be a structural problem. Maybe that is why they nixed the chopper water drop idea; dropping a lot of water on top of thing certainly wouldn't stabilize the structure and might drain through the building creating a nice radioactive steam bath for the workers down at reactor level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poll_Blind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. Yes, please! Unless it makes things worse- I really have no idea.
PB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taught_me_patience Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. If I were a pilot, I'd refuse the order.
Sorry... that is a suicide mission. The pilots that flew over Chernobyl are pretty much all dead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. Plus, the visibility might be very bad due to steam, smoke nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. I'd make the TEPCO CEO ride in the helicopter.
Hell, I think the top 10 earners of TEPCO should have to be in the same area right now as their most at-risk employees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jeanpalmer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
25. What about corexit
It did wonders for the Gulf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. Not needed. Radioactivity is already invisible....
Now if you had something that jammed geiger counters....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC