Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why is Manning being

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 10:56 PM
Original message
Why is Manning being
held without trial for this lonh? Does anybody know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. My guess is that they want Assange there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Is there a time limit for holding someone without trial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Not for Military Tribunals
why do you think they don't want the Gitmo detainees transfered to Civilian courts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thanks. I know very little about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because he's in the Military and
apparently they can do what ever the fuck they like, to anyone they like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. Because his attorneys requested more time to prepare a defense.
They are going to use Manning's mental state at the time as a defense, and asked for more time.

It requires getting expert witnesses lined up, interviews by them with Manning, opinions written...it takes time.

It's not that hard to find on the web.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. So much deliberate mis-information about this case out there.
Military rules for justice differ from what civilians are used to.

He is still considered a soldier, and must act like one, even in the brig.

He cannot stand for bail.

He must follow orders.



And so on...


But the idea put out that he is being held without charges or will be held indeterminately is nonsense, he was charged months ago, and again more recently.

His attorneys are the ones who needed time to build a defense around Manning's mental state. That is a difficult thing to do under time pressure without painstaking attention to minute details.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. That is incorrect. His lawyer had to file a demand for a speedy trial:
because the Pentagon was dragging its heels.

13 January 2011
Speedy Trial Update
On 9 January 2011, the defense filed a demand for speedy trial with the Government. PFC Manning has been in pretrial confinement since 29 May 2010. Since 12 July 2010, the case has been on Government requested excludable delay under R.C.M. 707(c). This delay request by the Government was approved by the court-martial convening authority.

The case is currently awaiting the start of a Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M) 706 Board. This board will likely begin its work in February.

http://www.armycourtmartialdefense.info/search?updated-max=2011-02-02T18%3A01%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=3
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Coombs can't have it both ways.
The subject of a reasonable delay often arises when the defense requests a sanity board be conducted. While a delay for this reason is specifically excluded from the time limit by R.C.M. 707(c)(1)(A), the government has an obligation to proceed with diligence. Courts have indicated an unwillingness to hold the government to a strict standard when processing a sanity board due to the complexity and importance of such examinations. See e.g., United States v. Badger, 7 M.J. 838 (A.C.M.R. 1979).



The courts will proceed with all due dispatch, but they do not want to be seen as not giving enough time for an adequate mental evaluation that will help in a legal defense

Attorneys file motions to present a position, to show that they are using every tool at their disposal to give their client the best defense possible. Coombs would be deficient if he didn't file this motion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. It's not "having it both ways" to expect due diligence. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. TY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. I expect this entire process to be very contentious.
Here's hoping that it manages to be a good process despite that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
obxhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. When they say you're signing your life away by joining the military
they mean it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
5. i think the new rule is that whatever they want to do with you, they'll do with you
no habeas corpus

holding of "material" witnesses

Guantanamo

etc. etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. isnt he up on capital charges? theyll want to kill him before its done.
obama is likely waiting till after the election to do the execution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Dear God - I hope not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-15-11 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
13. The biggest delay was granted based on a defense motion
filed many months ago to have the government review the security classification of the documents and other information involved in the case. Since there are a few hundred thousand documents there was a very long delay granted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC