Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Japanese self-defense forces now deploying helicopter for reactor cooling. live

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:14 AM
Original message
Japanese self-defense forces now deploying helicopter for reactor cooling. live
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 02:17 AM by Hannah Bell
to pour coolant/water on it.

on nhk japan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. helicopter is already in air -- deploying to cool reactor #3, the one with smoke/
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 02:20 AM by Hannah Bell
vapor coming out.

discussion here:

http://www.ustream.tv/channel/yokosonews
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradoxical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
2. They need to start considering building an emergency containment building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HEyHEY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Okay, I'll be stupid.... why don't the try concrete?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Concrete doesn't cool anything.
We're not at the point where a sarcophagus is needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradoxical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah we kind of are.
The reactor buildings and potentially the containment vessels are failing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradoxical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The fuel is almost certainly exceeding the melting temp of concrete.
Pouring concrete on it won't do much.

They need to continue to pour neutron absorbing material on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClayZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. ...for how long?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:39 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Water and boric acid
You want to slow down the reaction and cool the fuel. Smothering with concrete isn't a viable option because you can't block out all the air flow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GReedDiamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:35 AM
Response to Original message
8. Here in California...
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 02:45 AM by GReedDiamond
...we have the "super scooper" airplanes which can get water from the ocean and dump it on wildfires...why not use them in this situation?

On edit: I mean a literal fleet of 'em, bombarding the entire nuke complex with seawater.

Bring in the helicopters inbetween super scooper drops for more specifically targeted areas.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Scooper

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. I imagine the danger of spreading radiation?
Dumping a large volume of water at one time could send a lot of radioactive water back out of the building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:43 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. they already evaluated the risk & decided to go ahead, discussed in earlier
presser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Abq_Sarah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Helicopters, yes.
Air tankers, no. Helicopters don't carry the same volume of water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. That's good, they have to do something about No. 3 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
14. When I saw them I thought of the helicopters dropping boulders in levee breaches
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtuck004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 03:29 AM
Response to Original message
15. 5000 tons of sand...
Below is how they put Chernobyl out, found here... with her pictures.

Several things different about this, of course, including the reactor designed to hold a meltdown, no graphite fire. I understand why one would drop water from helicopters, and perhaps they are hopeful things can be slowed till they can get something permanent. The water is going to boil out, no power. Gonna have a helicopter brigade? I hope no continual exposure (probably is, with all the explosions and fires going on).

Hey GE, next time imagine a quake and a tsunami.
______________________________________

"On the Friday evening of April 25, 1986, the reactor crew at Chernobyl-4, prepared to run a test the next day to see how long the turbines would keep spinning and producing power if the electrical power supply went off line. This was a dangerous test, but it had been done before. As a part of the preparation, they disabled some critical control systems - including the automatic shutdown safety mechanisms.

Shortly after 1:00 AM on April 26, the flow of coolant water dropped and the power began to increase.

At 1:23 AM, the operator moved to shut down the reactor in its low power mode and a domino effect of previous errors caused an sharp power surge, triggering a tremendous steam explosion which blew the 1000 ton cap on the nuclear containment vessel to smithereens.

Some of the 211 control rods melted and then a second explosion, whose cause is still the subject of disagreement among experts, threw out fragments of the burning radioactive fuel core and allowed air to rush in - igniting several tons of graphite insulating blocks.

Once graphite starts to burn, its almost impossible to extinguish. It took 9 days and 5000 tons of sand, boron, dolomite, clay and lead dropped from helicopters to put it out. The radiation was so intense that many of those brave pilots died.

It was this graphite fire that released most of the radiation into the atmosphere and troubling spikes in atmospheric radiation were measured as far away as Sweden - thousands of miles away.

The causes of the accident are described as a fateful combination of human error and imperfect technology. "
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC