Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Battle at Fukushima Dai-ichi plant is just beginning, says reactor troubleshooter

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:21 AM
Original message
Battle at Fukushima Dai-ichi plant is just beginning, says reactor troubleshooter
ttp://www.knoxnews.com/news/2011/mar/16/battle-is-just-beginning-says-nuclear-reactor/

snip

If workers are unable to get additional cooling water into the reactor vessel, the molten fuel core will collapse into the water in the bottom of the vessel. Eventually the heat from the decaying fuel would boil away the water that's left, leaving the core sitting on the vessel's lower head made of steel.

Should that happen, "It'll melt through it like butter," Allen said.
That, in turn, would cause a "high-pressure melt injection" into the water-filled concrete cavity below the reactor. Because the concrete would likely be unheated, the reaction created by the sudden injection of the reactor's ultra-hot content would be immense, he said.
"It'll be like somebody dropped a bomb, and there'll be a big cloud of very, very radioactive material above the ground," Allen said.

Should these events happen, the best outcome would be if the winds are blowing east and push the radioactive plume over the ocean, he said.

"It (the radioactivity) will fall out in the ocean and everything will be fine," he said.
The worst case, Allen said, would be if winds pushed a radioactive cloud south toward Tokyo and Japan's highly populated cities. If that were to happen, he said, the consequences would likely be greater than the 1986 accident at Chernobyl, where about an entire area of Ukraine had to be evacuated because of the radioactive conditions that increased the risk of developing cancer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. There is a total of over 1240 TONS of nuclear fuel at Dai-ichi (Chernobyl was 180 tons)
Here are the numbers
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x666399

And there's a video link to Maddow there in the comments area.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. This is why no. 3 is ultra important and criticality is already going on
known by the boiling there, or so I read.

One molecule breathed in = lung cancer. A nice thing to get into the food chain too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. One molecule = lung cancer? Where do you get your "scientific" information? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. No.3 building has MOX, plutonium in the rods.
Watch the film 'Silkwood'.
All it takes is the amount that would fit on a pin to kill you.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thereismore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. A pin is a LOT more than 1 molecule. Don't spread panic. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm especially comforted that a highly radioactive cloud would drift over the ocean
and all will be fine. Fine until 5 headed whales and 8 legged tuna start showing up on dinner plates.

Oh yeah - warm and fuzzies all over.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
undeterred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. "It (the radioactivity) will fall out in the ocean and everything will be fine," he said.
No, not really.

The problem is harder to locate, removed for the moment from human population- but its not gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC