Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ann Coulter: "Japanese radiation exposure would be good news"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Amimnoch Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 09:59 AM
Original message
Ann Coulter: "Japanese radiation exposure would be good news"
A GLOWING REPORT ON RADIATION

With the terrible earthquake and resulting tsunami that have devastated Japan, the only good news is that anyone exposed to excess radiation from the nuclear power plants is now probably much less likely to get cancer.


much more at the link.

She's gone even further off of the deep end than I though was possible even for her!!!

Does she REALLY believe that a nuclear meltdown, and the radioactive contamination and exposure those poor people will endure will actually be GOOD for them?!?!

Maybe she should go there and get some healthy radiation exposure herself.

What a fucking moron.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why the fuck do you post a link to her site
and then post a provocative snippet but not the explanation (no matter how insane) that she proposed, almost ensuring that the curious would have to click on that link to discern her reasoning?

WTF not just post her stupid logic here?!?!??

I NEVER click on links to sites like that. Why post them????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. In the defense of the op, aren't we supposed to link our sources?
You don't have to click on it. To avoid that, I agree with you, posting her rationale would be helpful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. I'm not objecting to linking to the source
I'm objecting to posting just enough to entice people to click through. Fuck that, especially for Coulter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amimnoch Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
23. I'm sorry, I believe the rules state that due to copyright you can't post the entire article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #23
24. Sigh. I'm not asking for the whole article.
Maybe just the relevent sentence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amimnoch Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #24
37. My sincere apologies. Please be assured that boosting that woman's site
was NEVER my intention.

To me, this is an new low of lows.. even for her, and I wanted to share the information. I think this is only the second time I've started a thread the whole time i've been here. I mostly lurk, and occaisonally join in on issues that i feel exceptionally strong about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. I know this might amaze you but not every person is like you
Some readers do like to read things in context. DU frowns on posting whole op eds from other sources. Thus people commonly post links to original source. I personally won't click that link either (I know where to find a Coulter op ed myslef) but don't see how posting links to subject material that big a deal.

As for Coulter, clearly she isn't getting enough Strontium 90
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duer 157099 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. So in your mind, it's either the whole op ed or a titilating snippet?
There's a way to post within the guidelines and STILL convey the important info.

Maybe the Coulters of the world post provacative stuff to get hits to their site? Why encourage that by clicking through to their trash?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck off, Ann. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You wouldn't really want to do that, would you?
Might catch something. :rofl:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow, we can just take everybody in the world, sit them in front of the reactors
for an hour or so and we will have cured cancer in our lifetime.

Is she really that stupid or is she just desperate for some attention.

She's been beat out in the nutball race lately by Glen Beck, maybe she's trying to outdo him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Ann "you ignorant slut"
:shrug: What does anyone expect? And these are the people that speak for the Republicans....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yet another Republican piece of shit.
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 10:07 AM by liberalmuse
They seem to gloat about and feed off of human misery like vampires. Ugly, ugly people. I don't know where they dig up this wildass shit, but I'm astonished anyone published this garbage. They believe what they want to believe. I think she should test out her "theory" and camp out around Chernobyl, or better yet, make herself useful and volunteer for duty at Fukushima.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. her goal is to anger and upset people
mission accomplished
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hifiguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. Annthrax Coultergeist
Performance artist or just an asshole?

I vote for the latter. What a sub-human piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. Well, of course, a genetic mutant would think that.
More potential mates for her.

Apologies to genetic mutants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Angry Dragon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
12. palin, bachmann, whitman, etc. have taken her thunder
she feels left out and feels the need to see if she can lower the bar even more

The Regressive Party political bar is getting so low that only snakes and vermin
can crawl under it ......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. +1 I've been waiting for her to up the "batshit"
I knew it as coming since she has fallen off the radar. Republicans have found them some better looking idiots.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. Unreced and hidden, Coulter is a blight on the planet and deserves NO publicity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reformist2 Donating Member (998 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
16. What a time to trot out pro-nuke propaganda.

These people have no hearts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
17. Same old stale act.
Say something outrageous and hope someone notices. We can get the same wit and wisdom sitting at the bar in some redneck drinking hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
18. She points to studies by scientists stating that small amounts of excess radiation
such as that from naturally occurring radon are beneficial.

And that there is no evidence of deaths by survivors occurring from and directly attributable to being exposed to radiation from the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bomb blasts as well as the Chernobyl disaster.

So perhaps this twit and some volunteers amongst her gullible supporters should travel to Japan, grab water hoses and walk close up and unshielded to the stricken reactors and pour water on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amimnoch Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. That was my thought, if she thinks it's so damn good...
She should go over there and get some of it herself, and let some poor Japanese family that KNOWS the stuff is bad for them come back over here and stay at her place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
19. She's just jealous of Sarah Palin...
but there's little doubt that Governor Quitter will outdo her in the outrageous crisis statement of the month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raouldukelives Donating Member (945 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
20. So thats what a republican health care plan looks like..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forty6 Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #20
31. Good one! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
21. Coulter = Republicon Family Cesspool Values
Ptyoooey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
25. I wish that I were surprised to hear Ms. Coulter's take on the disaster
in Japan. I wish that I could excuse it by saying she must have been quoted out of context or was having a bad day and mixed up her sentence syntax. Sadly, having read and heard other Ann Coulter statements, I am not surprised in the least little bit. Actually I was kind of waiting for her to come out with some over-the-top reaction. I'm sorry to say that this statement is pretty much more or less what I expected. Damn, I hate when I'm right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flubadubya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
26. OK, it's that crazy-assed notion that high levels of radiation are good for people...
They (Ann) claim that "There is... burgeoning evidence that excess radiation operates as a sort of cancer vaccine."

If she really believes this then she out to get her butt on the very next flight to Fukushima and bathe in the glorious radiance, uhm, radiation. Sheez!! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
27. Coulter's career ended in 2007
She's reduced to a web site ranked by Alexa at 12,057 in the US.
Pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
40. A little further research....
Alexa US traffic rank

Democratic Underground: 1,322
Ann Coulter: 12,057

Say goodnight Annie
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
28. Proving once again that she knows nothing. People being treated for cancer with radiation are
warned they could develop another cancer from the treatments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forty6 Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. That makes sense. Cancer and radiation are very very inter-related. Even..
the medical practitioners know the risks. Why does a dentist put that lead vest on patients when x-raying teeth?

Geeze, that woman is such an ignorant selfish pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
29. They'll be people who will believe her -- but think she's ready for the trash bin -- !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forty6 Donating Member (849 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
32. From the AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: 3 paragraphs to set the..
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 12:24 PM by forty6
record straight.

Just in case some fools read Ann's article and believe her "pseudo" science.

"Does ionizing radiation cause cancer?

Ionizing radiation is a proven human carcinogen (cancer causing agent). The evidence for this comes from many different sources, including studies of atomic bomb survivors in Japan, people exposed during the Chernobyl nuclear accident, people treated with high doses of radiation for cancer and other conditions, and people exposed to high levels of radiation at work, such as uranium miners.

Most studies on radiation and cancer risk have looked at people exposed to very high doses of radiation in the settings above. It is harder to measure the much smaller increase in cancer risk that might come from much lower levels of radiation exposure. Most studies have not been able to detect an increased risk of cancer among people exposed to low levels of radiation. For example, people living at high altitudes, who are exposed to more natural background radiation from cosmic rays than people living at sea level, do not have noticeably higher cancer rates.

Still, most scientists and regulatory agencies agree that even small doses of ionizing radiation increase cancer risk, although by a very small amount. In general, the risk of cancer from radiation exposure increases as the dose of radiation increases. Likewise, the lower the exposure is, the smaller the increase in risk. But there is no threshold below which ionizing radiation is thought to be totally safe.

http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/medicaltreatments/radiation-exposure-and-cancer


In OTHER WORDS, MS.COULTER, you are full of bullsh*T!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
33. Annthrax is clearly desperate for attention.
In the age of Bachmann and Palin, she's yesterday's crazy.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bengalherder Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
35. Maybe she's a scientologist.
L Ron Hubbard thought that radiation was a-OK.

He also thought smoking cured cancer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
36. Hey mAnn, I hear Fukushima milk is the best in the world.
And you won't gain an ounce, what with the thyroid and other cancers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
38. I feel sorry for her...
With Glen Beck, Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin on the scene, it's a lot harder for her to stand out in the crowd...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
39. She's shilling for the atomic energy lobby. Radioactivity
did not cause your cancer. It is your fault you didn't get enough cesium and plutonium in your system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
41. Radium was once considered a cure for cancer
Perhaps she's confused as to what century this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
42. So Ann Coulter wants to see all Japanese dead?
Suguni shinu koto o nozomu!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC