Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zombie Nuclear Plants: It's Worse Than You Think. Undead Nuclear Plants Still Operating

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:42 AM
Original message
Zombie Nuclear Plants: It's Worse Than You Think. Undead Nuclear Plants Still Operating
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 11:31 AM by KittyWampus
Article touches on antiquated nuclear power plants that always seem to get life extensions from the NRC. It also talks about the failure of the NRC to do its job protecting Americans. Anyone who thinks nuclear energy can be provided without cutting corners/ignoring problems is mistaken.

NRC members are nominated by the POTUS and confirmed by the Senate. So a Republican dominated political culture can appoint cronies no matter how chummy they are with energy producers or lax they are with regulations.

READ THE WHOLE THING> I snipped out a lot.

Zombie Nuke Plants
Christian Parenti
November 19, 2009
http://www.thenation.com/article/zombie-nuke-plants?page=full

Oyster Creek Generating Station, in suburban Lacey Township, New Jersey... the oldest in the country, was slated to close in 2009 when its original forty-year license was ending. It had seen four decades of service, using radioactively produced heat to boil water into high-pressure steam that ran continuously through hundreds of miles of increasingly brittle and stressed piping. If constructed today, Oyster Creek would not be licensed, because it does not meet current safety standards. Yet on April 8 the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)--the government agency overseeing the industry--relicensed Oyster Creek, extending its life span twenty years beyond what was originally intended.

Seven days later workers at the plant found an ongoing radioactive leak of tritium-polluted water. Tritium is a form of hydrogen. In August workers found another tritium leak coming from a pipe buried in a concrete wall. Radiation makes metal brittle, so old pipes must be routinely switched out for new ones. The second leak was spilling about 7,200 gallons a day and contained 500 times the acceptable level of radiation for drinking water. That leaking pipe had erroneously--or perhaps fraudulently--been listed in paperwork as replaced. How this error occurred remains unclear. What seems likely is that the plant's previous owner, GPU Nuclear, was deliberately skimping on maintenance as it approached the end of the plant's license. Then Oyster Creek was sold to Exelon and won relicensing. How many other mislabeled, brittle, old components remain in the plant's guts is impossible to determine without a massive audit and investigation. Unfortunately, stories like this are all too common: crumbling, leaky, accident-prone old nuclear plants, shrouded in secrecy and subject to lax maintenance, are getting relicensed all over the country.

snip

The real issue is what happens to old nukes. The atomic power industry has a plan: it wants to make as much money as possible from the existing fleet of 104 old, often decrepit, reactors by getting the government to extend their licenses. The oldest plants, most of which opened in the early 1970s and were designed to operate for only forty years, should be dead by now. Yet, zombielike, they march on, thanks to the indulgence of the NRC.

More than half of America's nuclear plants have received new twenty-year operating licenses. In fact, the NRC has not rejected a single license-renewal application. Many of these plants have also received "power up-rates" that allow them to run at up to 120 percent of their originally intended capacity. That means their systems are subjected to unprecedented amounts of heat, pressure, corrosion, stress and embrittling radiation. These undead nukes are highly dangerous. But constant, careful (and expensive) inspection and maintenance would mitigate the risks. Unfortunately, the NRC does not require anything like that. And the industry often operates in a cavalier profit-before-safety style.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Zombies?
Edited on Thu Mar-17-11 10:45 AM by NeedleCast
I'll get my rifle...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great article and great post. K&R
Too bad some will focus only on the word "zombie". This article shows the main reason why nuclear power is too dangerous. Corruption in both the ownership and the regulation. The NRC should be shelled and rebuilt but I would not trust the current political system in Washington to do it without recreating the same sort of corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. They have to keep the old running
They can't afford to shut these plants down.

It will cost billions of dollars over many years to decommission just one of these plants.

Doing a proper accounting of all the costs from start to finish of nukes would be the beginning of the end of nukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enough Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. Thanks. I've been looking for something like this. Great article. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Profit before People!
God Bless America!
:patriot:




Who will STAND UP and represent THIS American Majority?
Platitudes, Rhetoric, Empty Promises, and Excuses are meaningless now.

"By their WORKS you will know them,"
And by their WORKS they will be held accountable.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cemaphonic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
6. OTOH, this is at least partially an unintended consequence of the success of the anti-nuclear lobby.
We haven't built any new plants in 30 years, but we also aren't willing to give up the energy they provide. So, older plants get recertified when they probably shouldn't be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chris_Texas Donating Member (707 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-17-11 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC