Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What is it with this "against his own people" line?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
howard112211 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 07:26 PM
Original message
What is it with this "against his own people" line?
Edited on Sat Mar-19-11 07:28 PM by howard112211
It is weird. People say it as if the act of a government using force against those it governs is more despicable than a government using force against people it doesn't directly govern. I would say the ranking should perhaps be reversed: Attacks on other nations are often more severe in scope than attacks occuring within one nation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
buddysmellgood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's the betrayal. It may be splitting hairs but would your rather be stabbed
in the face or in the back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. You make a point. The point holds firm
when people begin screaming, "So do you want PALIN?!?!" as election season heats up and Democrats have nominated a back-stabber.

A Republican promoting bad policy is a stab in the face. Elected Democrats doing it is a stab in the back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. So what? Wouldn't it be a GOOD thing that our action is "more severe in scope?"
After all, we are attacking those trying to attack the Libyan people, rather than the Libyan people. It seems your argument (that our attack might be more "severe in scope") points towards intervention -- not away from it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. honestly, the rhetoric is re-traumatizing me

Obama's announcement could have been exactly what Bush said about Saddam. It could be identical.

That's the tragedy of what Bushco did. They lied, damaging the words that another president might have to use later to justify war.

When I hear the mention of the other countries involved, I hear Bush say "coalition of the willing."

When I hear "against his own people" I hear Bush lying about Saddam.

Honestly, I'm sick of it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnroshan Donating Member (333 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The question is - Is Obama saying the truth?
If so, well and good.

If not, God help us.

I would say UN approval along with explicit support of several Arab nations does give the issue a veneer of credibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. D you believe that Gadaffi isn't bombing his own people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. I disagree. Every government's primary role is to protect its citizens. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gmaki Donating Member (301 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Agreed it has no real meaning
if "his own people" (as if he owns them) are attacking him then it is not surprising he is attacking back.

Sure we think he is wrong, and they are right but in the end it's a fight and one side is more powerful than the other and so they win.

It's not like Gadaffi just woke up one day and thought "I think I'll bomb a random city in my own country today" He is going after armed rebels (we'd call them "insurgents" to justify attacking them) that are attacking his government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. If you had been following the tweets from the Libyan revolutionaries, you would know
what the thoughts are of the people themselves:

"For people who are worried about the civilians killed by the no-fly zone. I have heard many Libyans say they are willing to die for freedom.

That is, if the have to die so that Gaddafi is removed, they don't mind.

They do mind being killed by Gaddafi."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x692608#692730

And don't bother to attack me.. I am giving you a message to consider, and have no desire to be involved in another petty DU flame war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. and I don't think they consider themselves "his" people
If aggression against other nations AND civil wars/internal struggles are BOTH reason to get involved then every conflict is an invitation for invasion and occupation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
11. A states responsiblity first and foremost is for its own people.
Yes it matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SolutionisSolidarity Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
12. It tends to lose creedence when it's used in every conflict.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. A government derives any right to so much as exist from its
people. So attacking them is at a basic level an act of criminality, as no such powers are sanctioned by the people. Governing is by consent, not by force.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-19-11 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. Genocide -- or attacking your own people to hold onto power --
should rightly be despised --

but you're correct, war of aggression -- imperialism -- should also be despised --

and it used to be! See Nuremberg trials!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC