Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. says missile strikes on Libya only "first phase"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 03:56 AM
Original message
U.S. says missile strikes on Libya only "first phase"

Sat, Mar 19 2011



USS Florida launches a Tomahawk cruise missile during Giant Shadow in the waters off the coast of the Bahamas in this file photograph taken in 2003 and released to Reuters on March 19, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/U.S. Navy photo/Handout

WASHINGTON | Sat Mar 19, 2011 10:41pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A series of more than 110 cruise missile strikes on Libyan targets is only the first phase of a multiphase operation, a senior U.S. military official said on Saturday.

Vice Admiral Bill Gortney, director of the U.S. military's Joint Staff, declined to discuss what the next phase of the operations would be. He said more than 20 sites had been targeted in coalition strikes so far.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/03/20/us-libya-usa-strike-idUSTRE72I3N120110320
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good
And for the first time in a while, we actually have the support of the UN and some of the other great powers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The support of the UN? Not the BRIC countries or Germany
Susan Rice was running around trying to lock down votes from every TinyStan she could

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I don't give a shit about the BRIC countries
If they want to oppose intervention, good for them. That's their choice. Britain and France are both on board and they are most assuredly not 'tinystans.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You should. They're laughing at the dying gasps of Western Imperialism
Which is probably a good thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. They aren't paradises
Russia is a mess, China is an authoritarian dictatorship, India has hundreds of millions mired in poverty, and Brazil is chaotic. Only two have long histories of Western Imperial domination, so the argument that they 'laugh' is a bit disingenuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. But they are oil investors in Libya.
Schlumberger and BP are big in Libya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:24 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Well then, call it off right away
After all . . . OIL. Did you hear me . . . I said OIL!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. You act as if we wouldn't kill for it. Have you been on vacation for the last decade?
Just wondering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:32 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. No I haven't
Do you have any real evidence that the current intervention in Libya is about oil? Or are you just saying 'oil' and hoping that's enough. You actually have to make a connection to the current situation here. The oil was flowing just fine under Ghaddafi and would continue to flow if he had his way with the rebels. I know it sounds crazy, but every once in a while, the Western democracies actually go to bat for their ideologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arctic Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Maybe the 98% oil tax structure has something to do with it.
If we intervened in countries that didn't have oil maybe I would be a little less cynical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RZM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Such as Bosnia, Kosovo, and Somalia?
Consider your cynicality satiated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Yes, first time R2P was used. Burma was tried, but China + Russia vetoed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. I can't remember, how many "phases" does it take to get to "partitioning?"
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:05 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. That's already a fact on the ground.
And unless the aggressor powers decide to send in ground troops, that's not going to change. So Libya as a unitary nation-state is no more at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I think you're right
So Libya as a unitary nation-state is no more at this point.

Wow. Just wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:16 AM
Response to Original message
11. Tomahawk Cruise Missle.. cost $1.2 Million each.. .it's not like we need roads or bridges at home..
The 1.5-tonne missile, which cost between $US600,000 and $US1.2 million each, can carry a 450-kilogram warhead and additional bomblets


THE Tomahawk cruise missile, which was used by US and British forces to strike Libyan targets, has been in the allied arsenal for about 30 years and is used for long-distance precision strikes.

Read more: http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/world/tomahawk-cruise-missiles-used-for-libya-assaultq/story-e6frfkui-1226024934986#ixzz1H85jZchs

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
16. I don't understand why people think cruise missles kill fewer people under
Obama than they did under Bush.

The truth is this: They kill the same no matter who is president.

So to all you folks celebrating our bombing of Libya: You're hypocrites in my opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
bowens43 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
19. Time to escalate
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 07:01 AM by bowens43
lets get some boots on the ground, the war machine needs to be fed!!!

This action is pure stupidity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC