Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AFP: China regrets multinational air strikes in Libya

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:01 AM
Original message
AFP: China regrets multinational air strikes in Libya
http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gsMGTXDFWbd2pGgZVLVrGHXgJ7UQ?docId=CNG.1411cd01df64d8f14a45e3962493fb9a.571

BEIJING — China expressed regret on Sunday over the multinational air strikes in Libya, saying in a foreign ministry statement that it opposed the use of force in international relations.

"China has noted the latest developments in Libya and expresses regret over the military attacks on Libya," the statement said.

Russia also issued a similarly worded statement in which it called for a ceasefire as soon as possible.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. They're not big on preventing governments from massacring
their own citizenry.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meow mix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. +rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LAGC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe they're a little concerned about such justfication being used to attack them in the future?
After all, what would have happened if the international community responded in kind after Tianenmen Square?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
11. Because only Western powers have the right to
slaughter the citizens of the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. Yes, that's likely one reason they sank Burma in 2007.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. So regretful that they chose not to block the attacks with their UN veto?
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 11:07 AM by msongs
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. Well, wait till the UN goes into North Korea-they will REALLY regret that!
China and Russia abstained from voting on this issue, when either or both could have blocked any UN action...they are both playing politics now and they are both full of shit.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hmmmmph. Isn't that special. Nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. They just do not want any Group to be calling them out on Human
Rights or anything else. Naturally they see this as
a slippery slope and one day the UN could come down
on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
8. So does the Arab League.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. "serious diplomatic setback as the Arab League chief condemned the "bombardment of civilians.""
From your article

West's strikes on Libya hit Arab League criticism
By Maria Golovnina and Michael Georgy – 21 mins ago

TRIPOLI (Reuters) – Western forces pounded Libya's air defenses and patrolled its skies on Sunday, but their day-old intervention hit a serious diplomatic setback as the Arab League chief condemned the "bombardment of civilians."

...


Arab League chief Amr Moussa called for an emergency meeting of the group of 22 states to discuss Libya. He requested a report into the bombardment which he said had "led to the deaths and injuries of many Libyan civilians."

"What is happening in Libya differs from the aim of imposing a no-fly zone, and what we want is the protection of civilians and not the bombardment of more civilians," Egypt's official state news agency quoted Moussa as saying.

...

A senior U.S. official rebuffed Moussa's comments.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20110320/wl_nm/us_libya
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The list of those opposed will only get longer as more people die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. However, that little tidbit was overlooked in the OP.
I also like the conflation of 10 votes in the Security Council to "The UN".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. But, but it's a coalition!!
Did the United States win legitimacy through the vote at the UN? Hardly. Five huge world powers abstained: India, Brazil, Germany, China and Russia. Using its enormous clout as the world’s last, if declining, hyperpower, the United States had to dragoon tiny little countries such as South Africa, Nigeria and Portugal to vote yes, or it couldn’t have won the nine votes it needed to pass the resolution. At one point, Susan Rice had to scurry out to find the South African ambassador, who’s apparently tried to avoid the vote. The vote almost didn’t pass, since the United States, the UK and France ended up with only ten votes in the UNSC.

http://www.thenation.com/blog/159346/obamas-women-advisers-pushed-war-against-libya


If this wasn't so :cry: it'd be :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. Good
Just like in Iraq, the gang is killing more people than the dictator and then capturing the oil fields - if you believe the West ever gave a damn about human beings go and study the Atlantic slave trade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
13. Thank you China and Russia
and thank you Germany for refusing to participate in this damn madness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
16. Bull. China backed down because their human rights record
is almost as shitty as Libya's and they didn't want to draw attention to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-20-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
17. Then they should have blocked it by voting "Nay:"
I guess they'd rather be called hypocrites instead.


OK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC