sibelian
(543 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:30 PM
Original message |
We cannot assume that the West's intervention in Libya is benign. |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 02:41 PM by sibelian
We can no longer make this assumption about the military activities of the West following Iraq.
It is clear that the Libyans desire freedom from oppression and if our hands were not already blood-stained and copy-books riddled with fewer lies we might have been able to walk into that conflict on the side of those whe seek freedom without being open to criticism. But never again can we be trusted.
I speak not as an American but as a British citizen. What are we to assume? That the same sinister forces at work behind the Iraq invasion have simply disappeared?
Are we to assume that their preference for the murderous exploitation of resource will be waived simply because this conflict provides an opportunity rather than a planned target?
|
lob1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:38 PM
Response to Original message |
1. We fired 124 Tomahawk missiles. That doesn't sound benign. |
sibelian
(543 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. The Arab League certainly doesn't seem to think so. |
mazzarro
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |
3. You have raised salient issues... |
|
I am torn between conflicting desires and not sure what to cheer for anymore.
|
sibelian
(543 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
6. Infinite gratitude for measured response... |
|
This is not a simple situation...
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:44 PM
Response to Original message |
Starry Messenger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Your last sentence is dead on.
|
Catherina
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:47 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Sadly, those sinister forces haven't disappeared. They've been very, very busy |
sibelian
(543 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. Yes, I saw that. That thread is an education in itself... nt |
kenny blankenship
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
8. I assume it is about oil. Gaddafy was a devil we could all do business with |
|
because for 40 years he proved he had Libya well in hand. That meant a steady oil supply. Companies could count on contracts executed last year being honored 5 and 10 years out. But now the Col. is old and close to death, and Libyans are showing that he doesn't have control or legitimacy in Libya anymore. If he manages to put the rebellion down militarily, he is still old and Libya is still out of control. He will not forgive the rebels as individuals, families or towns. There will be reprisal slayings of people suspected of being rebels or having rebel sympathies. For their part the rebels will not forget that they want him dead and his cult-of-personality government overthrown. The reprisals which have been promised by Gaddafy from the outset will make it impossible for them to forget. Troubles in Libya will not end with the recapture of Benghazi by Gaddafy's loyalists and mercenaries. The rebellion will become a resistance. The rebels won't strike at Gaddafy's govt directly anymore. They will sabotage the source of that government's strength, which is the oil.
Suspecting this, how can western powers feel the same way about Gaddafy as they did before? Before the revolution he was a devil you could do business with, but now he's just a devil.
|
corpseratemedia
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. yes im afraid this is the conclusion ive also come to |
sibelian
(543 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
It's a pity your clarity is not readily available to others posting here...
|
snot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:49 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Good way to put it; K&R'd. |
sibelian
(543 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
10. Thank you. I'm a little worried at how simple some people want this to be... |
snot
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
17. I'm just now watching a recent interview of Chomsky re- this situation -- |
joshcryer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Well hey! That's not been posted here at all today! |
sibelian
(543 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. We cannot assume that the West's intervention in Libya is benign. |
Rex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |
14. War is never benign, always malignant. |
|
That is how world wars get started...this imo is NOT one of those times. Lybia has been an off and on again friend, but it looks like Omar finally had the welcome mat pulled out from under him. Shouldn't have let his troops mow down protesting civilians, THAT is what caused this intervention. That and the fact he is a tiny country that can easily be toppled by large conventional forces (think Grenada).
|
silver10
(492 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 03:07 PM
Response to Original message |
16. Britain gets 90% of their oil from Libya |
|
US fought our own wars, now fight yours. Or is your government saying that this time, is different. It's really about humanitarianism? It's different than all the bullshit conflicts we've been in.
Maybe certain people in Libya want the West's interference? Are they paid stool pigeons? Is is really just some other god-damned dictator who will step in after Moe? How many civilian casualties will there be - it's not like those missiles are really exact? Will it create more hatred in the Middle East for the West?
Who are the "bad" ones and who are the "good" ones? This will not turn out any better than any other ME conflict we've stuck our nose in. Over a million Iraqis dead, no democracy after 8 years of fighting. I wonder if those million Iraqis would have thought how things turned out were worth it?
|
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
19. "Britain gets 90% of their oil from Libya" - just wrong or a straight up lie |
|
Its less than 5%.
Not that I really care but really...
|
sibelian
(543 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #20 |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 07:41 PM by DURHAM D
|
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
24. Was the poster talking about you? |
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #24 |
|
I have been away for several hours and looked at it quickly and misread it.
Now deleted. Thanks again.
|
silver10
(492 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #19 |
21. The U.S. hardly gets any oil from Libya - the EU are MUCH more dependent on Libya's oil than US |
DURHAM D
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Mar-20-11 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #21 |
|
Edited on Sun Mar-20-11 07:15 PM by DURHAM D
The US get less than 2%.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon May 06th 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message |