nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-11 12:12 PM
Original message |
Thank you CONGRESSMAN MARKEY |
|
our two lovely plants in California should have never been licensed, neither Indian point.
Those plants should not have any licence renewal... San Onofre has two years to it's licence and so does the one in NorCal
|
flamingdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-11 12:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. He's right we need to fix the not working safety systems in the CA plants |
|
and address our choices about energy in the future.
Not to mention nail the pugs to the wall about their destructive policies.
|
nadinbrzezinski
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-11 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Found it telling when he said we need to make sure |
|
we have enough iodine in place.
Something tells me that the STATE and the FEDS should order a full review of plans, including upscaling them from when they were licensed.
The other thing that shocked me, is the WHO seems shocked they found trace elements in water, milk and vegies.
I was like... we know this from long held science.
|
Obamanaut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I'm guessing the Congressman made a statement of some sort somewhere |
|
that has some bearing on the message block.
Might this OP be expanded upon for clarification/enlightenment?
|
flamingdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-11 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Markey (MA) was on MSNBC, you could check his website |
|
He's been outspoken on this issue.
|
Obamanaut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Mar-21-11 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Fleshing out a post is normally quite helpful. Not everyone has the |
|
same teevee (or other) source tuned in to the same channel as the person making such a cryptic post.
There are even some who are not watching anything at that specific time.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 04:55 PM
Response to Original message |