Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Md. lawmakers want to limit credit checks on job seekers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:33 PM
Original message
Md. lawmakers want to limit credit checks on job seekers
Robert Robinson wanted to be a security guard. Easter Morris tried becoming a cleaning lady. Kyla Whiting sought work at a handbag outlet store.

All say they were denied jobs because their would-be employers learned that they had low credit scores.

In response to such stories, state lawmakers now are moving to limit the ability of businesses to run credit checks on job applicants.

"A credit report should not be the measure by which people are judged in terms of whether they can do a good job or not," said Sen. Catherine E. Pugh. "It's almost like an invasion of privacy."

Read more: http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/bs-md-employer-credit-check-20110320,0,4512779.story

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. IMO credit checks should only be allowed by law if the one being checked agrees
and provides written/signed consent. Also, all credit information IMO should be locked/frozen by default indefinitely until one being checked gives consent, and this applies for any inquiry. And one should not be forced to provide credit information to secure a job.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Then employers will simply use that refusal as an excuse to turn you down
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yep, ... so we also need something that says it can't be used at
all, even asked. I think we need to go back and revisit all of the privacy laws in the US and update them for the 21st century ... so that people have more privacy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Make it both illegal for reporting agencies to share, and for employers to use
That would help to plug most of any potential holes, and end-arounds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yep!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Almost?
"A credit report should not be the measure by which people are judged in terms of whether they can do a good job or not," said Sen. Catherine E. Pugh. "It's almost like an invasion of privacy."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. "It's almost like an invasion of privacy." No it IS an invasion of privacy, and no proof of anything
other than you need a income
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jacquelope Donating Member (364 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Way to go, Maryland! n/t
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. now lets talk about piss tests
preemptive criminal investigations are as insane as preemptive wars based on lies
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. So if your credit report is bad because you're out of work...
then you're really screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. If you are being hired for a money-handling job, it could be appropriate
in some instances, but for any other position it should not be a part of the application process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Why? It's the people with the most money and best scores that are robbing us blind. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Including money handling jobs like cashier @ McDonalds, WalMart, etc?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. I disagree
I know a very successful bank officer who had been bankrupt three times before she finally landed a job in a bank. She was a single parent whose ex didn't pay child support...her credit sucked. She has advanced up the ladder in her position, owns a nice home, car, etc. Kids are grown now and she has a seemingly stable future. A credit check would have eliminated her possibilities of this job. Not every one who has bad credit is going to steal from you and we seriously need to stop treating them like they will. People with good reports are just as likely to steal and the argument could be made that they are willing to steal to keep their credit rating, wbere as someone who has a low score would have a higher score if they stole because they could actually pay their bills.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Operative words = "could be"
If the job requires bonding, there might be a credit check involved..

Honesty is not the issue.. Company policies are what they are..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC