Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WTF Dennis, WTF?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:41 PM
Original message
WTF Dennis, WTF?
Throwing out the "I" word to these crazy ass nutbag birther Teabaggers and drunken tanning bed whores running the Congress? Are you nuts? Are you seriously off your rocker giving them ammunition?


Now I know you're out there, put your tinfoil hat on and ride your hobby horsey down the halls of Congress....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. WTF drainbramaged, WTF?.... lol
dont know what you are talking about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. i just saw the thread. thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #6
31. My image went bye bye
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:45 PM
Original message
nevermind. i see what D did. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's bad enough here we rip the President to shreds, but DK?? (big sigh)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
23. i hear ya. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. kucinich claimed that bombing libya was an impeachable offense for President Obama
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. i see. thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think the proper label is Leftbagger
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Thanks. I thought it was TeaSmoker
Edited on Mon Mar-21-11 05:50 PM by SpiralHawk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. I support Kucinich
as I always have. He is consistent, and I respect that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nice childish personal insults
Care to explain why what he said isn't true? Or do you just want to make fun of someone because you dont agree with them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Not worth a reply
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
39. Dennis was the first to verbalize the "I" word.
I don't believe for one second the Teabaggers/Repukes weren't already readying their Impeachment speech. Dennis just beat them to the punch. Took their steam away, so to speak. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReggieVeggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
11. oh for christ's sake!
Like he was standing in fron of the Beck rally calling for Obama's impeachment! You people need to calm down. If what Obama did could be considered an impeachable offense, suppressing discussion doesn't seem a very liberal notion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. HAHAHAHAHA you made a funny
not
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyRingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Here's the headline:
Edited on Mon Mar-21-11 05:51 PM by JohnnyRingo
"Democrats admit they made a mistake. Can they ever be trusted again?"

Do democrats want to eat that headline now, or wait until November?
It'll be a cold day that a dem gets elected if their fellow party members primary Obama or move to impeach. Believe me, there's no way to defend what will be shouted through the Fox News/ AM radio megaphone: That the Democratic party is a failed institution.

Those here that feel they can put another candidate up in November and everything will be hunky-dory should be advised as well. We bought it, and we have to live with it. There are no other options lest we welcome a decades long Republican White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes... After his olive pit lawsuit, I just thought Dennis had lost it a bit...
Now, I don't know what to think about him. But, agree or disagree re: policy towards Libya. Obama is technically following the letter of the law vis-a-vis the War Powers act. To suggest impeachment, is contemptible grandstanding IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. I know, over an olive pit, pathetic....
Edited on Mon Mar-21-11 06:28 PM by DainBramaged
And with the best health and dental plans in America.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
26. No, it was over a broken tooth and thousands of dollars in dental bills..
Do YOU expect to bite into an olive pit and break a tooth when YOU order a sandwich somewhere? Would YOU expect the people responsible for the damage to pay for YOUR expenses? I sure as hell would...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. I have to agree with you.
Jesus, I wanted this guy to be President back in 2002. I was pretty stunned to read what he said today, and yes, it is reactionary and uncalled for. Hell, when a liberal starts jumping the gun faster than the worst, nutball conservatives, then I have to wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
18. Dumb-ass stupid thing to do.
What the hell kind of Democrat gives an iota of legitimacy to the idea of impeaching a fellow Democrat when so many asshat Republicans are chomping at the bit to do it?

Dumb-ass stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. You are completely right
Democratic presidents should be allowed to do whatever illegal shit they want without repercussions simply because republicans want to see them fail.



1. Democratic President commits possibly illegal act

2. Democratic congressman alludes to fact that illegal act could lead to impeachment

3. Republicans jump at chance to impeach president

4. ?????

5. Democrat who brought up impeachment is an evil republican-enabling traitor and democratic president is completely impeachment-free.


Flawless Logic.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Why are you so upset? Is it because you have feelings for Dennis, or want Obama impeached?
how sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
revolutionnow45 Donating Member (203 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. Kucinich was not so quick to demand impeachment when it was truly deserved
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramulux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. Seriously?
You are going to go after the one guy in congress who actually offered up articles of impeachment because he didn't do it sooner? I guess he should have, but its funny that you bring this up like its so damning to his character. If we are going after Dennis for not trying to impeach Bush sooner, I'm pretty sure that means there are literally no democratic congressman liberal enough for those people. Dennis was mocked and ridiculed by members of his own party for bringing up impeachment, but I guess he was just doing it for fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 07:39 PM
Response to Reply #32
33. !!11 SERIES!!1111
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. THIS IS HUGH!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
19. It's not an impeachable offense as per the War Powers Act
Which authorizes the President to use military force for 60 days without congressional approval. It's only an impeachable offense if you believe that the President isn't empowered to use any force whatsoever without a formal declaration of war by congress. In which case you would have a good number of Presidents to retroactively impeach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Doesn't the US have to be under attack or direct threat under that Act?
I don't know, I'm no expert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. Exactly. Dennis Kucinich lost relevance long ago, may his district
get merged post haste.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. War Powers Act ...
"The War Powers Resolution of 1973 (50 U.S.C. 1541–1548) was a United States Congress joint resolution providing that the President can send U.S. armed forces into action abroad only by authorization of Congress or if the United States is already under attack or serious threat..."

Where is the attack or threat from Libya to the US?

Links here...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=703645&mesg_id=703751

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/2011/03/18/libya

"...The arguments made to justify such unilateral presidential action are uniquely unpersuasive. Former Bush OLC official and Harvard Law Professor Jack Goldsmith, along with others, points to Clinton's air bombing campaign of Kosovo without Congressional approval, but the mere fact that X happened in the past does not mean X is justifiable; ...

...And then there's the notion that the War Powers Act entitles a President to order military force for a limited time without Congress, but that constitutionally dubious statute has never been tested and thus does not remotely resolve the constitutional question.

The one point I want to underscore is that the constitutional requirement for Congressional approval is not some legalistic or technical barrier; it's vital..."



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #19
35. Obama is just following established precedent of the Bush Doctrine.
If it was not impeachable under the Bush Misadministration, then without the lies of them, then it must be ok.






















:hide:

and

:popcorn:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Aw get off it. Bush wasn't the only one to do it. Try going back
the past 30 or 40 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PurityOfEssence Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
24. If it's bad that they do it, it's bad that we do it.
Kucinich, for all his many faults, is fairly consistent. He voted for continuing the impeachment inquiry against Clinton early on, and he did so because he thought there was potential merit to the charges. Upon determining that they didn't have merit, he voted against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. But Clinton was impeached by the Congress, his vote didn't matter
and sometimes your conscious can get a lot of other people in trouble they don't deserve...


The charges against President Clinton had NO MERIT, read The Hunting of the President to understand how hard the Right worked to knock him out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestate10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Conscious. WHAT??? Anyone that was thinking would have realized in
two minutes that republicans were looking for ANYTHING as fuel to impeach Clinton. Give me a break, democrats don't need gullible politicians like Kucinich around. First he makes an absolute ass of himself suing over damaged teeth from an olive pit, then he runs around talking about impeachment of a President that is working fully within his authority under the War Powers Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-21-11 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
34. Ha! Politics is fun. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
37. Dain, you confuse me.
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DutchLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
38. Well, Obama should be impeached, but not over Libya...
... but over indefinite detention, keeping Gitmo open, extraordinary rendition, drone attacks, not restoring habeas corpus...

All things we wanted Bush to be impeached over, but we support it when Obama does it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC