Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

From the Pentagon to the Private Sector

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 12:53 PM
Original message
From the Pentagon to the Private Sector
Edited on Sun Dec-26-10 12:56 PM by maryf
On edit: really long article at link, please read there, the comments are good too...

In large numbers, and with few rules, retiring generals are taking lucrative defense-firm jobs

by Bryan Bender

WASHINGTON - An hour after the official ceremony marking the end of his 35-year career in the Air Force, General Gregory "Speedy'' Martin returned to his quarters to swap his dress uniform for golf attire. He was ready for his first tee time as a retired four-star general. But almost as soon as he closed the door that day in 2005 his phone rang. It was an executive at Northrop Grumman, asking if he was interested in working for the manufacturer of the B-2 stealth bomber as a paid consultant. A few weeks later, Martin received another call. This time it was the Pentagon, asking him to join a top-secret Air Force panel studying the future of stealth aircraft technology.

Martin was understandably in demand, having been the general in charge of all Air Force weapons programs, including the B-2, for the previous four years. He said yes to both offers.

<snip>
From 2004 through 2008, 80 percent of retiring three- and four-star officers went to work as consultants or defense executives, according to the Globe analysis. That compares with less than 50 percent who followed that path a decade earlier, from 1994 to 1998.

<snip>
Among the Globe findings:

■ Dozens of retired generals employed by defense firms maintain Pentagon advisory roles, giving them unparalleled levels of influence and access to inside information on Department of Defense procurement plans.

■ The generals are, in many cases, recruited for private sector roles well before they retire, raising questions about their independence and judgment while still in uniform. The Pentagon is aware and even supports this practice.

■ The feeder system from some commands to certain defense firms is so powerful that successive generations of commanders have been hired by the same firms or into the same field. For example, the last seven generals and admirals who worked as Department of Defense gatekeepers for international arms sales are now helping military contractors sell weapons and defense technology overseas.

■ When a general-turned-businessman arrives at the Pentagon, he is often treated with extraordinary deference - as if still in uniform - which can greatly increase his effectiveness as a rainmaker for industry. The military even has name for it - the "bobblehead effect.''

<snip>
Retired Army General Wesley K. Clark, who now works as a lobbyist and investment banker for companies seeking alternative energy contracts, believes the growing hunger among private equity firms and Wall Street investors to enlist retired generals is a consequence of a broader phenomenon: the increasing importance of the military to America's industrial base.
"It is the militarization of the economy,'' Clark said in a recent interview.

http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/12/26
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
somone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. "The Pentagon is aware and even supports this practice"
There you have it. It's an obscenity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yep
Obscenity is the word...just another step to fascism seems to me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep, corporate rule, control, goverence, spending by MIC, and who's going to
fight it ... will be mowed down. President Eisenhower to my knowledge was the last president to stand up against it and call it for what it is ... most Americans are asleep. Lambs to the slaughter.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Eisenhower quotes
(thanks pinko)

In all those things which deal with people, be liberal, be human.
Government must have a heart as well as a head.

A foreign policy based on international cooperation:
We shall continue vigorously to support the United Nations.

A call to civil service:
We will vigorously promote, as we have in the past, a non-political career service under the merit system which will attract and retain able servants of the people.

Progressive taxation:
Further reductions in taxes with particular consideration for low and middle income families.

Infrastructure:
To meet the immense demands of our expanding economy, we the largest highway, air and maritime programs in history, each soundly financed.

Statehood for D.C.:
We favor self-government, national suffrage and representation in the Congress of the United States for residents of the District of Columbia.

Environmentalism:
We favor a comprehensive study of the effect upon wildlife of the drainage of our wetlands.
We recognize the need for maintaining isolated wilderness areas

Taking on big business:
A continuously vigorous enforcement of anti-trust laws
Legislation to enable closer Federal scrutiny of mergers which have a significant or potential monopolistic connotations;
Procedural changes in the antitrust laws to facilitate their enforcement.

LABOR
Extend the protection of the Federal minimum wage laws to as many more workers as is possible and practicable.
Stimulate improved job safety of our workers, through assistance to the States, employees and employers.
Assure equal pay for equal work regardless of Sex.
Clarify and strengthen the eight-hour laws for the benefit of workers who are subject to federal wage standards...
Revise and improve the Taft-Hartley Act so as to protect more effectively the rights of labor unions, management, the individual worker, and the public.

bringing back the Equal Rights Amendment!
We recommend to Congress the submission of a constitutional amendment providing equal rights for men and women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks! Yep, we've had some great presidents that understood what needed to be done! n/t
Edited on Sun Dec-26-10 01:30 PM by RKP5637
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Not sure how many were great...
but at least some seemed to have genuine concern for the general populace over the ruling class in some instances...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yep, that's what I meant. Thanks. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. of course, nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soryang Donating Member (642 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. The notions of "chinese walls" and "personal integrity"...
Edited on Sun Dec-26-10 01:27 PM by soryang
...are absurd when it comes to ethical regulations on conflict of interest. As soon as these lame expressions are used to defend access to inside information when a private agency relationship exists with a contractor, you know you are dealing with a corrupt relationship.

The waiting period should be five years to at least create the appearance of an arms length relationship. In the alternative, Flag officers who wish to follow the one year and two year limits should be forced to forfeit their commisions and retirements.

Maybe then they could more readily ascertain where their primary interest lies, to their country or their wallet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. thanks, your points are so reasonable
but it seems they don't even care to create an appearance of lack of conflict of interests...sigh...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Business as usual. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Yep, Just another way to support our troops...
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. bump nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-26-10 11:35 PM
Response to Original message
14. one more bump for the night crew...
worthwhile article, IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC