Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House: Helping install 'a democratic system' is goal in Libya

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
The Northerner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:50 PM
Original message
White House: Helping install 'a democratic system' is goal in Libya
Edited on Tue Mar-22-11 02:50 PM by The Northerner
The White House suggested on Tuesday the mission in Libya is one of regime change, despite emphatic statements from President Obama and military brass that the goal is not to remove Moammar Gadhafi from power.

According to a White House readout of a Monday night call between Obama and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, the two leaders "underscored their shared commitment to the goal of helping provide the Libyan people an opportunity to transform their country, by installing a democratic system that respects the people’s will."

The term "installing" suggests the goal of regime change.

In an e-mail, White House press secretary Jay Carney said there is no change in the U.S. military mission, which he wrote was clearly focused on protecting civilians. He also noted Obama's remark on Monday that Gadhafi is no longer fit to lead.

From the onset of the strikes against Libya, senior administration officials have said the goal is to create an atmosphere where Libyan rebels would be able to oust Gadhafi from power.

Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/151191-white-house-suggests-regime-change-is-goal-of-libya-mission?page=1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
daa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. More Obama BS, How is that goal working out in Gaza or Iraq? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Quite aside from Saudi Arabia.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. or Afghanistan, etc, etc...
yep, more BS. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Do you really want to know what Afghanistan was like before we invaded them?
The place was a shit hole where women were getting shot at in soccer stadiums and men were being hanged for being gay. Yes, there is still lots of problems in Afghanistan but the place is a lot better than what it used to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #9
23. Have you read Dexter Filkins "The Forever War?"
He's an excellent war correspondent - it's a very good read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #9
24. That is debatable, to be sure
Edited on Tue Mar-22-11 05:26 PM by ixion
and I'm sure there are people living in Afghanistan who think otherwise.

And further, WHO THE HELL DO WE THINK WE ARE TO INVADE WHOMEVER WE PLEASE FOR WHATEVER REASON WE CHOOSE?!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. This was clearly about regime change from the beginning. Did anyone think differently? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. How about we start right here in Wisconsin?
There wasn't any doubt that the idea was to leverage this "humanitarian crisis" to the advantage of american corporate interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let's have it both, make that three (four? more?) ways
We're protecting civilians, so we're not involved in regime change. But Gadhafi has to go, because he's no longer fit to lead. We want a democratic system installed, but if the people are so dense as to install someone we don't like (like Hamas in the Palestinian territories), then they're wrong and a bunch of terrorists. But there's no change in our military mission. Of course, if those two jet pilots had been taken captive by Gadhafi's men instead of being taken in by friendlies, there would be hell to pay. We have to respect the people's will, as long as nobody among the people adopts a stance adverse to U.S. interests. We don't really know that much about the internal dynamics of the Libyan political system, so we don't know who we might be helping and who we might be harming. And we hope that nobody in opposition to Gadhafi is so conniving that they'd also be working against their fellow protestors/rebels before Gadhafi is deposed. Not that we are working toward regime change.

Wait. What?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. By jove, you've got it!!!!!!
Now, repeat after me:
"The rain in Spain falls mainly on the plain"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StarburstClock Donating Member (583 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's a direct violation of the UN Charter to be involved in regime change
Not that many people actually care what the UN charter actually says, which is that aggression is allowed to protect civilians only, it is not allowed to be used to direct other country's regimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. Does 'democratic system' = 'puppet government'?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. When Does It End?
When does it all end?

Why do I have this sinking feeling that we are about to enter yet one more quagmire???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. "days, not weeks"
President Obama said so just the other day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Hmmmmm.... February 7, 2003
"It could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months," he said, speaking at the American air base at Aviano, in northern Italy.
.
.
.
That is what Rumsfailed said too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Does That Mean "Mission Accomplished"?
Does that mean that President Obama will be able to say "Mission Accomplished" in a few days?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Cakewalk. Garlands of flowers. I promise you. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 07:13 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. are we gonna pull down statues too?
I wouldn't want us to do any less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. Holy crap it IS 2003 again. Lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. 'suggested'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BzaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm not sure what the news is here. Obama has said from the beginning that it is the goal of the US
to remove Gadaffi from power (and presumably we would prefer another dictator not take his place). But as Obama said in the press conference yesterday, that is NOT the goal of the MILITARY mission (which is strict limited to protecting civilians and enforcing the UN resolution). He said the US would continue to use diplomatic means (such as sanctions) and other means to encourage Gadaffi to leave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 07:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
27. so we protect the citizens by firing scuds at them and
surgically removing the houses they live in so they can wander about the streets while waiting for their infrastructure
to be rebuilt by some contractor or other.

Makes sense to me, but it reminds me of someplace where we destroyed villages in order to save them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
17. The U.S. Senate basically has said the same thing in the March 1st resolution in clause #11
S.Res.85:

SNIP

(11) welcomes the outreach that has begun by the United States Government to Libyan opposition figures and supports an orderly, irreversible transition to a legitimate democratic government in Libya.

SNIP

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x717373#717754


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sad sally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. Here an American leader goes again - defining democracy for
another Country's people we claim to know everything about how they want to be governed.

By Abdulsattar Hatitah

Cairo, Asharq Al-Awsat – Libyan tribes played an important role in the country's fight against Ottoman, and later Italian, colonialism, with many Libyan tribal members sacrificing their lives in this war. It is believed that there are currently around 140 different tribes and clans in Libya, many of which have influences and members outside of the country, from Tunisia to Egypt to Chad. However Dr. Faraj Abdulaziz Najam, a Libyan specialist in Social Sciences and History, told Asharq Al-Awsat that the Libyan tribes and clans that have genuine and demonstrable influence on the country number no more than 30 .

In a country that has lived under the brutal dictatorship of one man for more than forty years, namely Colonel Muammar Gaddafi –of the Gaddafi tribe – the majority of Libyans depend on their tribal connection in order to obtain their rights, and for protection, and even in order to find a job, particularly in the state apparatus. In a study conducted by Dr. Amal al-Obeidi at the University of Garyounis in Benghazi, it was revealed that the two largest and most influential Arab tribes in Libya originated from the Arab Peninsula, and these are the Beni Salim tribe that settled in Cyrenaica, the eastern coastal region of Libya, and the Beni Hilal that settled in western Libya around Tripoli. However other Libyan researchers and expert also revealed that around 15 percent of the Libyan population have no tribal affiliation whatsoever, being descendents of the Berber, Turkish, and other communities.

http://www.asharq-e.com/news.asp?section=3&id=24257?du
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeSwiss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
21. When they're finished.....
...maybe they can install one here.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
22. oh jeeeezzzzzuzzzz, not again
is there any chance we here might get a crack at the same some day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KurtNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. we are going to clone our system there so that the Kochs
and US Chamber of Commerce can select the next leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
28. ...Aaaaaaaand THERE go the goalposts!
But who's honestly surprised anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC