Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Our goal in Libya, upon completion of which we will cease operations, is...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 05:52 PM
Original message
Poll question: Our goal in Libya, upon completion of which we will cease operations, is...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Other:
Find a new war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. lol Thread Win right off the bat
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Somehow I got the idea everyone else was real clear about this
:dunce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
4. I very much hope no such condition has been defined, for two reasons.

The condition for ceasing operations should be "stopping will do more good and less harm than going on".

If the US has set a defined goal, which it will continue on until and then stop, then

1) It might achieve that goal before my condition is achieved, and pull out too soon.
2) It might not have achieved that goal at the point my condition becomes the case, and stay in too long.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 11:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. What do you think our record is on properly identifying "more good and less harm?"
In Iraq? In Afghanistan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-23-11 05:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. I think that the decision was muffed at the start, but probably taken correctly since then.
I think that the US should not have sent troops into Iraq, but having done so it probably should be winding them down slowly rather than pulling them all out overnight - Iraq is a complete mess, but I think it will get even worse if/when the US goes. On the other hand, I don't see any prospect of Iraq being in a state where it could not disintegrate if the US leaves any time soon, so arguably it might as well be now as later.

My views on Afghanistan are similar, except that I think that whereas in Iraq invading was clearly a stupid idea because there was no chance of setting up a functioning state, in Afghanistan setting up a functioning state might well have been possible if the US had focussed on nation building rather than invading Iraq (I think that it is no longer possible, sadly).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robcon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Regime change is the only objective.
'President Barack Obama said Muammar Gaddafi must leave Libya, saying the besieged ruler has lost his legitimacy to lead.'
http://www.cnbc.com/id/41883246
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-22-11 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. So if he doesn't leave, neither do we
What of the aftermath? What do you think of Obama's reported goal: providing Libya with the opportunity for transformation via the installation of a democracy? Is our presence contingent in any way on how they make use of such an opportunity? If there are proscriptions by the opposition forces, what then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC