Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The United States is the single largest exporter of large conventional weapons in the world.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 12:14 AM
Original message
The United States is the single largest exporter of large conventional weapons in the world.
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 12:53 AM by Toucano
Sow the wind, reap the whirlwind.



http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/03/global_arms_exports?fsrc=scn/fb/wl/dc/presentarms

The volume of such exports rose by almost 25% compared with 2001-05.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 12:17 AM
Response to Original message
1. USA = Global Gun Runners -- !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
2. These type topics get totally ignored. BUT THIS ONE WON'T IF I CAN HELP IT.
Two days ago I'd posted the following to ZERO responses:

"Do you have any money to invest? Smart investors know a sure bet. :) America had ceded making stupid things like TVs, clothing, textiles, ceramics, tools, et cetera to China, India and other countries but we kept the manufacture of 'good stuff' right here at home.'We had to stop making tools, household goods, and 'stuff' because arms are more profitable. And if we don't keep conflicts stirred up, then our arms industry won't thrive."

Excerpt:

Thriving arms industry

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/ed20110227a2.htm ...

Global arms sales reached new heights, according to a recent report by a think tank in Sweden. Despite the global recession, the sales, both domestic and exports, of the world's most profitable arms-producing companies increased by nearly $15 billion from 2008 to 2009, reaching a total $400 billion in arms sales throughout the world — the highest amount ever. Other estimates put that figure as high as $1 trillion.

The report from Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) shows that the arms industry is thriving despite the ongoing global economic recession. American company Lockheed Martin took first place with $33.4 billion in arms sales, followed by British BAE Systems at $33.3 billion. Even as the recession hangs on in every country, more and more is still spent on the military.

Companies in the United States make up nearly half of world sales, according to the SIPRI report, with 45 of the top 100 arms-producing companies based there. Recently Russian companies have been a close second, though its figures, like those of the seventh-largest arms producer, China, are hard to verify.

In nearly every region of the world, arms-producing companies, many of them also exporters, have increased their sales year on year. The fastest-growing expenditures have been in Asia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thank you. I don't know why people don't connect the dots.
I've never heard a G-8 leader speak about the need to eliminate and reduce weapons production.

We've got factories running on oil, that build weapons used to secure the oil that fuels the factories, that build the weapons...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. +10000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is why I think we have a moral obligation to intervene in situations like Libya.
We sell these arms worldwide ostensibly as self-defense weapons for individual countries to protect themselves. But when these same weapon systems are pointed inward and used to suppress the citizens by a criminal dictator, I have a hard time supporting a US policy that says we shouldn't get involved. We got involved when we did the weapons deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 01:08 AM
Original message
That's not quite the reaction I have to this news.
The moral obligation would seem to be something akin to "stop making and selling things that people use to kill each other with."

"Intervening" in the conflict our little "employment boosters" create seems to be the cart in front of the horse.

Make things that help humanity, not things that increase the suffering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. I thought Libya purchased their land-based weaponry from Soviet/Russian/Eastern Bloc nations
and their aircraft from France and the old Soviet Union?

Not arguing with your point about our weapons exports; we seriously need to re-prioritize our economy, and our international stance.

Just not sure how this applies, specifically, to Libya.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. You may be, in fact, correct with regards to Libya.
I'd certainly like to see the UN become pro-active in addressing the growing problem of unrestricted weapons technology sales that creates a race for each country to spend more and more on 'defense'. Somehow, these weapon manufacturers need to be held accountable for reckless selling decisions that make it easier for tyrants to use these weapons to control their civilian populations.

My only point is that if we want to become isolationist with regards to getting involved in the internal civil wars of other nations, that position would be better served if we weren't a primary enabler of undemocratic regimes to maintain their control because of our weapon export sales. If we have to spend taxpayer money to neutralize the effects of these sales, we ought to pass that cost back to the arms manufacturers who sold and profited from those weapon sales in the first place. Otherwise, there's a positive incentive to continue business as usual. Privatize the profits and socialize the risks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liquorice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
6. I would assume at least some of the reason
we export so many weapons is because we give so many countries billions in military aid and require them to spend the (taxpayer) money at US weapons manufacturers. So it's basically a way of subsidizing the
American weapons manufacturing industry. I always get mad when I think about that suspicious little arrangement. There is a lot of room for major corruption with that kind of thing going on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Isn't there always someone making sure those stockpiles get used?
"Thank you, come again"

"Always Low Prices. Always"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Modern_Matthew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
7. Watch this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 01:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. +1
Verified: not a Rickroll. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paradoxical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
9. Foreign armies either operate off of Soviet surplus or American supplied defense technology.
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 01:13 AM by Paradoxical
You either fly Mig's or F-16s

You either use AK-47s or M4s.

7.62 or 5.56 mm full metal jacket


There are very few exceptions to that rule. We are that good at exporting death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrightKnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 02:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. ...and we control the spare parts. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quaker bill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 05:53 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yes and
the bulk of our aid to foriegn countries goes to subsidize these purchases.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
15. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC