Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN is praising suicide bombers now

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Electric Monk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 05:42 PM
Original message
CNN is praising suicide bombers now
Some Libyan rebel packed a car full of gas cans and blew himself up to take out a Libyan Army barracks, but don't fret, now it's cool. It's a valid tactic when the "good guys" do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. You do get that he didn't blow himself up in the middle of a bunch of civilians, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. It has long been a tactic in asymmetrical warfare.
I really don't see much of a distinction between suicide missions and asking soldiers aged 18-25 to kill and die for war. It is only a difference of certainty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. fuhgeddabowdit
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 05:48 PM by Bucky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
True Earthling Donating Member (373 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's an OK tactic to use against an army in a war
Not OK to use it against unarmed civilians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Whoever wins will write the histories and then you'll know if it's good or not.
It's a tactic. It has consequences. If your side wins because of it, HOORAY! If not, oops. It's used by the side with fewer military and negotiating options to strengthen its hand. How do you think the Palestinians wound up with embassies in 96 countries and the UN? The downside for them is that they get frisked everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJvR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-24-11 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. As long as...
Edited on Thu Mar-24-11 05:53 PM by CJvR
...the target is military and the attacker is a valid combatant there is nothing illegal about it. It is just slightly more dangerous than being the first man over the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC