David Sirota: A New Red Dawn

[marmar]

from truthdig:




A New Red Dawn

Posted on Mar 24, 2011
By David Sirota


The 1984 film “Red Dawn” fantasized about a group of American teenagers called the Wolverines who valiantly repelled an invasion of foreign communists. For its mix of dystopia and hope, the movie became such an enduring cultural touchstone that U.S. military leaders honored it by naming their 2003 effort to apprehend Saddam Hussein “Operation Red Dawn.” Amid the triumphalism, however, we missed the fact that the invaders started winning—a fact that none other than “Red Dawn’s” 2011 remake underscores.

That’s the subtext of a Los Angeles Times report this week about MGM taking “the extraordinary step” of digitally removing fictional Chinese villains from the $60 million film “lest the leadership in Beijing be offended.” Why the fear of upsetting such an odiously anti-democratic government? Because movie executives worry that a film involving a negative message about China “would harm their ability to do business with the rising Asian superpower, one of the fastest-growing and potentially most lucrative markets for American movies.”

The studio suits are right to be concerned. China’s government allows only about 20 non-Chinese movies per year into its theaters, and in the late 1990s the regime halted Walt Disney, Sony and MGM business in the country after those companies produced films deemed critical of China. Seeking to avoid a similar fate, the film industry now regularly shapes its products to appease—rather than challenge—the political agenda of the Chinese despots. In that sense, the only thing newsworthy about this week’s “Red Dawn” tiff is the public nature of the content revision.

Whether you are a “Red Dawn” fan or not, the episode shows that for all the high-minded theories about American cultural exports aiding democratic ferment and challenging autocracy, the dynamic is starting to work the other way as autocracy gives orders to American culture. Indeed, wielding its increasing market leverage, China is now countering our First Amendment ethos with a push for what Times reporter Ben Fritz calls pervasive “self-censorship”—the kind in which America’s media industries preemptively shape content to keep China’s dictators happy. ............(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/a_new_red_dawn_20110324/?ln

[zbdent]

1. I do remember watching the original "Red Dawn" ...

and I also remember thinking, not too long ago, why it surprised (allegedly) Repugs and Conservatives that, *gasp*, a bunch of people in their native lands would be angry about an occupying force "rescuing" them from their "tyrannical" leader ... Remember, this was pre-Tea-Party, pre-Obama ... when the Repugs suddenly thought their country had been hijacked.

Red Dawn made heroes of the same types of people who are now called terrorists ... those who were fighting the occupying forces ... but, of course, the "Tea Party" people are not referred to as "aiding the terrorists", like the "liberals" were ...