Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Holt remains skeptical about conclusions in anthrax investigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-11 05:38 AM
Original message
Holt remains skeptical about conclusions in anthrax investigation
http://www.nj.com/mercer/index.ssf/2011/03/holt_remains_skeptical_about_c.html

While a panel of psychiatrists said this week that Bruce Ivins, the Maryland scientist believed by authorities to be behind several anthrax-laden letters in 2001, was “psychologically disposed to undertake the mailings,” U.S. Rep. Rush Holt, D-Hopewell, maintains that the FBI has not proved its case.

The anthrax attacks, which came in the weeks following 9/11, killed five people and infected 22 others. The letters were mailed from a box on Nassau Street in Princeton Borough. The Postal Service’s center on Route 130 in Hamilton was closed for four years for a fumigation after anthrax-laced letters were routed through its machinery in 2001.

(snip)

“I think this just adds a little more circumstantial evidence that Ivins was the culprit,” Holt said in a telephone interview yesterday. “I don’t think it cinches the case.”

Holt added that, after rushing to conclusions in naming Dr. Steven Hatfill a “person of interest” in the case in 2002, there was little reason to believe the veracity of the FBI’s investigation into Ivins’ role in the attacks.

(end snip)

I forget, Mr. President. We are able to drop bombs on whoever, demolish the rights of all American workers, and promote the nuclear energy inspite of its EPIC FAIL because we don't look back anymore, right O? Rep. Holt has a bill in Congress to create a commission to look at the Anthrax attacks. That wasn't part of the deal, either, was it O? After all, it was just postal workers and hospital workers and 90 year old ladies and somebody who published an unflattering photo of Jenna Bush who died. Who cares, right O?

/sarcasm off. I still care, O.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
IScreamSundays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-11 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hatfill saved his life by making it a public case.
They couldn't suicide him because he made sure the media told his story.

Ivins didn't have that luxury.

Weapons grade Anthrax.

Don't forget about the National Enquirer reporter that exposed the Bush twins falling on the floor drunk, was the first casualty of the anthrax attacks.

And don't forget that Dan Rather also received a dose as well.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IScreamSundays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-11 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. kicking for the heck of it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-11 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. kandr n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-26-11 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
3. interesting. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooked911 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. that psychological profile is lame, the fact is the FBI's case is very flawed
Edited on Mon Mar-28-11 08:48 AM by spooked911
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC