Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A DU CALL TO ACTION!!!! EVERYONE must contact this guy TODAY.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:35 AM
Original message
A DU CALL TO ACTION!!!! EVERYONE must contact this guy TODAY.
Edited on Mon Mar-28-11 09:56 AM by Snoutport
I don't know if you read the article in breaking news about Congressman Hank Johnson asking Congress to look into the security groups HBGary Federal, Palantir Technologies and Berico Technologies, that were offering to hack into private computers of Liberals for the chamber of commerce. Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, declined to pursue the matter. Lamar Smith has no right to cover up what might be the Watergate of our generation.

WE MUST WRITE OR CALL REP. Lamar Smith IMMEDIATELY AND DEMAND AN INVESTIGATION!


The Honorable Lamar Smith
United States House of Representatives
2409 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-4321

DC Phone: 202-225-4236
DC Fax: 202-225-8628
his email is here: https://lamarsmith.house.gov/Contact/default.aspx

C'mon people! YOUR tax dollars might be being used to spy on you because you are a liberal. CALL TODAY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:41 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I sent my email. YOUR TURN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. The word "Palantir" is the intellectual property of JRR Tolkien's estate
Maybe somebody should call Houghton Mifflin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm not a lawyer and I could be totally mistaken
but unless there's some reasonable chance that "Palantir Technologies" could be mistaken for Tolkien's works or for Houghton Mifflin, and thus cause them financial harm, I don't think that there'd be much of a case here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. They are pretty militant suers though, from what i hear! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:55 AM
Original message
That's what I was thinking; Chris Tolkien is famous for suing anybody who uses his dad's stuff
Worth a shot, at least.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
9. LOL... would be nice to see. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hey, it might be worth contacting them.
What do I know? It could be legitimate infringement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Sounds like there's case law against it
http://ezinearticles.com/?Can-You-Copyright-News-Headlines?&id=5357557

Typically, single words, short phrases, advertising slogans, characters and news headlines have been refused copyright protection even where they have been invented or newly coined by an author. The courts have given different reasons for denying copyright protection to such works. One reason offered by the Courts is that the 'works' are too trivial or not substantial enough to qualify for copyright protection. The case of Exxon Corporation v Exxon Insurance Consultants Ltd (1981) 3 All ER 241 is a leading English precedent where copyright was refused for the word Exxon as an original literary work.

Exxon argued it enjoyed copyright in the word Exxon having invested time and energy in employing linguists to invent the word, contending that the actual size of the literary work doesn't preclude a work from acquiring copyright protection. The court found that the work was too short or slight to amount to a copyright work.

The Court also stated that although the word was invented and original it had no particular meaning, comparing it with the word 'Jabberwocky' used for Lewis Carroll's famous poem. US case law has only recognised limited intellectual property rights in invented names or fictional characters in exceptional cases. There is no modern English or Australian case which has recognised that titles, phrases, song and book titles should be granted copyright protection.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drm604 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. But aren't we discussing trademark law rather than copyright law?
They're two different things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Link to article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vincardog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
12. Sorry, that zipcode is for another district. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. lol...it came off of his own congressional website!
you'd think they'd get the zip code right!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
13. Thanks. Very important. Here's some more info
on Hank Johnson's request to Congress. I put it up a couple of weeks ago:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x675273

Rep. Johnson: This scandal cries out for an investigation. I’ll do it by myself if I have to.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Snoutport Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. GOod info! Thanks for sharing the link nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC