by: Colorado Pols
Mon Mar 28, 2011 at 10:50:56 AM MDT
http://www.coloradopols.com/diary/15415/messaging-101-its-a-cigarette-tax-cutAs we discussed yesterday, one of the major sticking points responsible for the looming impasse in the Joint Budget Committee this year is a proposal by Republicans to cut sales taxes on cigarettes (note our choice of words). The vivid contrasts offered between cutting cigarette taxes and further cuts to public schools, as we said, make this a politically bizarre, and potentially very costly idea to pursue in the midst of the ongoing fiscal crisis.
To be clear, what we're talking about has its origins in House Bill 09-1342, which eliminated the sales tax exemption for cigarettes in the state two years ago. This bill passed somewhat less controversially than other tax credit repeals a year later, and it was written to "sunset" the exemption repeal after two years. The presumption at the time was that the exemption would be renewed, or not, based on economic and fiscal conditions in 2011.
So what do you think, folks? Has the budget situation improved enough that we can spare the $30 million a year these cigarette sales taxes have brought in? Isn't that almost 10% of the proposed cut to K-12 education this year? Can't the decision to allow the sales tax on cigarettes to "sunset" fairly be called cutting taxes on cigarettes?
The reason we're pointing this out is, we've heard it wrongly inferred that higher taxes on cigarettes are some kind of new proposal by Gov. John Hickenlooper. Hickenlooper's proposal only calls for the renewal of the existing sales tax that will otherwise go away. And for the purpose of winning the message war for an anxious voting public, there's a really big difference.
Don't think so? That's cool, you're the reason Democrats lose these debates all the time.
Go to the link to read comments posted to the article. -