Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I don't think the government believes Manning is responsible for all those cables.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:11 PM
Original message
I don't think the government believes Manning is responsible for all those cables.
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 01:14 PM by Joanne98
I think they believe there's someone else but they have no idea who it is. They are probably looking in the State Department for the cables leak. It only makes sense. A State Department employee would better understand the importance of them.

It's the way they're acting.

Wikileaks probably has hundreds of US leakers. They want to know who they all are even the commercial leaker that gave the banksters up. They KNOW that wasn't Manning.

This is a war against ALL leakers.

IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. You think he's being made an example of? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Yeah and they're torturing him cause they think there's someone else.

They're trying to find out if he knows anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Do you mean, big-T-torture beyond the solitary confinement?
Or just the solitary? I still don't find it remarkable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. They're "medicating" him, whatever that means. In the 1970s...
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 01:47 PM by Smarmie Doofus
US M$M was full of stories about the "barbaric" USSR security establishment which would institutionalize dissidents and troublemakers by "hospitalizing" and drugging them.


The rationale: you'd have to be nuts to object to the activities of the national security (USSR) state.

Real barbarians.... those Russian commies. Imagine... holding a political dissident in solitary and drugging him besides, to advance a government agenda: keeping state secrets from the general public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. No. I just mean solitary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Yes, they're torturing him because they want to know all he knows.
They're trying to break him down entirely, and it sounds as if they're doing a pretty good job.

Solitary confinement. No bedding. Chained. Sleep from 8 pm to 5 am. No sleep in between. Almost no human contact. No exercising in his cell.

These are torture, and they are designed to oppress the prisoner, who has not been found guilty of anything.

Anyone who doesn't see that needs to spent some time learning what human rights violations are, and why how a country treats its prisoners is how it will treat anyone who steps out of line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's the war against the People -- to keep us infantilized and passive.
Those pillars are based on a) not letting us know the true story about anything (wars, elections, et al), and b) keeping us distracted with stuff.

B) is faltering, as the economy does, and they're terrified that A) may not be as "secure" as it once was, either...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Autumn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. I tend to agree with you on that.
The amount of the cables and the variety of them, banks, diplomats, makes me think that there are many leakers. I hope there are legions of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. I agree. The treatment of Bradley Manning is more than punitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. I agree. I think he leaked the Iraq War Logs
and the Afghanistan War Logs.

But the ones about to be released in January regarding the Banks, I think they had to be from someone else.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. He did leak the war logs. He told someone he did and they turned him in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. He told Lamo, the hacker whose own credibility
appears to be now in question. He has been charged with leaking classified material and specifically the helicopter video. But I cannot find anything other than Lamo's statements, that he has confessed to anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
90-percent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
10. difference
Edited on Mon Dec-27-10 01:49 PM by 90-percent
The difference between our governments treatment of Manning and Stalin's treatment of Russian citizens is only that of magnitude.

Part of the accelerating baby steps to America going full blown police state.

Thom Hartman mentioned on his excellent two part interview with Chris Hedges that Posse Comitatus is now inoperative. Nothing says totalitarian police state like turning your armed forces against your own citizens!

But the war on dandruff changed everything.

-90% jimmy

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
11. I disagree; that was the point of SIPRnet
The whole reason that network was built was so that even low-level personnel with the correct clearance would have access to other agencies' documents. A DoS leaker would probably have weeded out the just "silly" documents (Qadaffi's buxom Ukrainian nurse, for instance).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. I don'y know. If I were a State Department employee who wanted to get out
cables on a specfic incident and I didn't want them to trace it back to me. I would bury it in a bunch of other cables. Like hiding a needle in a haystack.

It could be someone, a diplomat even, that had been complaining about something and decided to get his case heard this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. I see your point; a sort of steganography
I can also see a logistic reason for how it went down. Manning (or whoever) had to grab whatever he could and put it on a physical USB stick as quickly as possible (if there actually was a physical drop-off in the US), which would probably make discrimination of the files you pick kind of difficult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. And even so, the cables reveal how over classified everything is.
That's just as important as any one revelation, imo.

When Conyers had his hearing on Wikileaks, even the Republicans started spitting when they talked about over classification and how hard it was to get the information they needed to do their own work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
12. One extraordinary consequence of there being...
...a Julian Assange--is that people who want to stop this corrupt, piece-of-shit,
anti-democracy government that we now have---have a place to hand over information
that exposes the criminals.

That's a beautiful thing, regarding Wikileaks.

You know damn well that not EVERYONE who knows about the neocons and their sick, perverted
warmongering and corporatist baloney---agrees with it. Some are playing along to keep
their jobs and power. Others are too terrified to do anything. At this point, the neocon
claws are entrenched and there's not a lot one person can do to challenge the system
from within.

However, due to Wikileaks and Assange--people can expose the rotting system.

I hope more and more brave souls come forward and leak all kinds of information. That's
really what our government is afraid of. That people now have an outlet for exposing
these criminals.

Seriously. This is our last hope. Either Wikileaks works as it is supposed to--and
our corrupt government, politicians and corporate partners in crime are exposed--or they
never will be and we continue to slide into Fascism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-27-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. The "wikileak drop boxes" are a brillant idea. No one knows who did it
not even Wikileaks. If Manning haven't told on himself he wouldn't have gotten caught.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC