Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel is on Lawrence's show analyzing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 07:01 PM
Original message
Rachel is on Lawrence's show analyzing
the Obama speech
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. And doing a damn fine job...
as always!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. As always
as always!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. She is brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hitman Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Maddow '16
I'd vote for her. She'd never win, but I'd vote!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pisces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. She should at least be VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jimlup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Indeed but in some ways she would be wasted that way
She is far too keen to be wasted doing the work of the empire even if it is trying to stir it towards a saner course.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hitman Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. You remind me of those on the Right who say the same about Palin.
Although you might be correct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 12:11 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Are you REALLY comparing a multiple community college dropout
to someone who had a Bachelors Degree in Public Policy from Stanford AND a doctorate in Political Science from Oxford on a RHODES SCHOLARSHIP????

Give me a fucking break. Rachel is probably more qualified to be a politician than the majority of politicians in DC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Denis Kucinich on now with Weiner n/t
Edited on Mon Mar-28-11 07:17 PM by malaise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm of a different viewpoint. I was disappointed in not hearing the President
name the Arab allies as he enumerated other allies.

I think we're being set up for a long participation, i.e. waiting for Gadhafi to step down. Waiting, rather than going after Gadhafi specifically, would be less expensive, in the President's eyes. I was surprised he didn't use the 'we don't do regime change' meme.

The President could have made me feel better had he given a clear picture of what the rebels want once Gadhafi leaves. Well, time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mazzarro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Why is forced regime change not applicable to...
Yemen, Syria, Bahrain, Morocco, Iran, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia? After all these are not governed by democratic regimes? I am against the blatant hypocrisy in foreign policy and wars!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-28-11 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Me too..nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-29-11 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. The countries you mention either have no oil or their dictators play nice with the oil companies.
Saddam had to go because he wasn't cooperating with OPEC, and Gadhafi has tried to make independent deals. Afghanistan wanted a better deal to allow the gas pipeline to be built on their territory.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC